Home » From The Readers, Letters to the Editor » Cell Phone Studies and How the Blood Brain Barrier is Penetrated

Cell Phone Studies and How the Blood Brain Barrier is Penetrated

smart metersSedona AZ (June 22, 2016) – The following is a letter to the SedonaEye.com editor and the Sedona City Council:

Clarifying EMF and Cancer: Precautionary Occupational Strategies and Results of the NTP Cell Phone Studies & How the Blood Brain Barrier is Penetrated & More News

Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:40:12 -0700

1.  I just finished listening to a conference call sponsored by The Collaborative on Health and the Environment and discussion by two scientists Drs. Bowman and Wyde   http://healthandenvironment.org/

Clarifying EMF and Cancer: Precautionary Occupational Strategies and Results of the NTP Cell Phone Studies

http://healthandenvironment.org/wg_calls/18482

smart phone cell towerThese conference calls will be ongoing for the next 18 months as ways to train employees exposed to ELF will be explored and I encourage everyone who is able to sign up and listen in. The next call will be 6/29/16 and you can register on the Health and Environment’s website.

For those who may not be aware there have been two successful awards made through Worker’s Compensation for employees who had been exposed to EMF who developed serious health effects as result made. The last award occurred in 2014, I believe, for a nurse with an implanted electrode at a hospital in NYC as a result of health damage incurred by her exposure to the MRI.
2.  “Microwaves” = Wireless 
Dave Ashton's photo.
The Blood Brain Barrier (“Keep Out”) – Neuroscience for Kids (via Sue McCully)  https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/bbb.html
Nancy Baer, Co-founder
Sedona Smart Meter Awareness
Sedona AZ

 

Read www.SedonaEye.com for daily news and interactive views!

Read www.SedonaEye.com for daily news and interactive views!

11 Comments

  1. N. Baer says:

    The City agreed to the contract back in 2003 BEFORE anyone knew anything about wireless. Also, for what it’s worth, there are miles and miles of fiber optic cable along I-17 (or underneath) that can be used for broadband.

  2. N. Baer says:

    Response from AZ AARP regarding APS Demand Charge Proposal.

    – Check out the national policy:

    “AARP utilities advocacy here in Arizona must be, as elsewhere, in compliance with AARP’s national policy and our local resource limitations. AARP’s national utility policy, available online at http://policybook.aarp.org/, Chapter 10 “Utilities: Telecommunications, Energy and Other Services” includes the following:

    Policymakers should prohibit mandatory or opt-out time-of-use metering and billing program. Policymakers in states that adopt an opt-out approach should ensure the following protections:

    Residential customers should be able to opt-out of having a smart meter installed. Customers who opt out of a smart meter should either retain their current analog meter OR receive a non-communicating digital meter, depending on which option policymakers deem to be most cost effective.

    A utility should have the opportunity to recover from customers who opt out of smart meters only the just and reasonable costs that result from their decision, as long as those costs have not already been recovered in rates and the utility has taken steps to minimize their costs. Cost recovery should be in the form of a one-time fee (if a field visit is required) and a monthly meter- reading fee to reflect the non-standard meter-reading process.

    The initial cost charged to customers who opt-out should incorporate the so-called “exit fee” that would cover any costs, not already included in rates, that are incurred when terminating service at a location so that the next customer of record will not incur additional charges to install a smart meter upon request.

    A lower cost for implementing the opt-out meter option should be provided for low-income customers that are identified through the utilityʼs existing low-income ratepayer assistance program or, where such programs are not available, through a customer’s participation in LIHEAP.

    The approved opt-out program should be conspicuously disclosed to all customers prior to installation of a smart meter, and through additional educational materials for those customers whose meter has already been installed.

    At this time AARP’s utility advocacy priority here in Arizona is defeating the proposed mandatory demand charge in the current APS rate case, the voluminous case you too referenced in your email. AARP believes this first in the nation mandatory demand charge will make utility bills unpredictable and reduce residential consumers ability to control their electric expenses to 1/3 of their bill. A particularly serious aspect to those on fixed incomes. Mandatory demand charges, should APS succeed in getting them approved, will apply to approximately 1 million APS customers, and may trigger approval in other states.

    Nancy, Co-Founder Sedona Smart Meter Awareness

    Sent from my hardwired computer with all wireless functions turned OFF

  3. Alarmed says:

    In addition to the three mandatory demand charges–wedded to usage times–the APS rate case filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission on June 1, 2016 (Docket E-01345A-16-0036) seeks fees to recover manual meter reading costs from those who opted out of smart meters.

    APS concludes the total stated base rate increase is 15%, and the net customer bill impact is 5.74%.

    The egregious opt-out fees APS requested:

    $70 one-time set-up fee
    $15 per month meter-reading-fee

    Item 8.b. on the Tuesday, June 28, 2016 Regular City Council Agenda states: “Discussion on this matter is intended to elicit direction from Council on what, if any, role the City of Sedona may take in the rate case, either directly or indirectly.”

  4. Tracey Burkeholder, Nevada says:

    Your headline email arrived yesterday and its packed with interesting reads and information. Q? If it’s unlikely to avoid towers and with governments profiting from and promoting our ill health by approving them, can the average home sue their local representatives or use a civil or class action suit? Organizing or encouraging not to have smart meters is one piece, but it doesn’t tackle the continued problems. Thanks.

  5. To Tracie says:

    It is not necessarily true that cities can not have input about where cell towers are placed fortunately. Here’s a good reference as to where cell tower construction has been defeated and I’d be surprised if it didn’t take heavy citizen participation to achieve positive results, as with anything if enough people get involved and complain, things CAN and WILL change:
    http://www.celltowerdangers.org/defeated-cell-towers.html

  6. @Tracey in Nevada says:

    Search cell tower on sedona eye. There is a lot of good information here. see below

    https://sedonaeye.com/county-cell-towers-going-up-near-you/
    also
    http://www.whyfry.org
    Power to the people

  7. 30% of Sedona residents Opted Out says:

    Sedona residents need to remember that 30% of us, including businessess, had opted out and never had our analog meters removed!! There should not be any $70 “set-up” fee applicable http://www.sedonasmartmeterawareness.com/SMART-METER-FREE-BUSINESSES.html. Be sure to let City Council know to vote against APS proposals!!

  8. N. Baer says:

    TALKING POINTS FOR SEDONA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6/28 AGENDA ITEM 8B, 4:30 PM SEDONA CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 102 Roadrunner Drive, Sedona, AZ 86336 If you cannot be present, please send an email for distribution to Council members to “SIrvine@sedonaaz.gov” and ask her distribute it:

    1. APS states that these fees are needed to “recover costs of manual meter readings.” APS, however, fails to list and enumerate their cost savings from firing several hundred manual meter readers, and the associated fuel, maintenance, and repair costs of the vehicles they previously used to make manual meter readings of several hundred thousand APS customers.

    2. Additionally, those of us who were aware they could, comprising 30% of Sedona’s population, have maintained our analog electronic meters, so APS never installed smart meters unless it was without home owners’ consents.

    3. These cost savings should more than offset any costs of manually reading the meters of the few thousand customers who opted out.

    Thank you!
    Nancy, Co-Founder, Sedona Smart Meter Awareness

    Sent from my hardwired computer with all wireless functions turned OFF

  9. Stop Using Smartphones in Public says:

    http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-06-text-messaging-smartphones-triggers-brain.html

    Notice this study appeared in “Epilepsy and Behavior.”

    It’s time to stop using your smart phone in public and exposing people to harmful frequencies. What you’re doing to yourself when you text on your smart phone should remain a private matter.

    Nancy Baer, Co-founder, Sedona Smart Meter Awareness

  10. Any Guesses? says:

    http://gizmodo.com/texting-produces-an-entirely-new-kind-of-brain-wave-pat-1782730253

    Gee……..I wonder who has the ability to tap into this brain wave frequency? Any guesses?

  11. Mary, VOC says:

    Appreciate the info

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2008-2017 · Sedona Eye · All Rights Reserved · Posts · Comments · Facebook · Twitter ·