<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Cell Phone Studies and How the Blood Brain Barrier is Penetrated	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 19:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary, VOC		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary, VOC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2016 19:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Appreciate the info]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Any Guesses?		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128620</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Any Guesses?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/texting-produces-an-entirely-new-kind-of-brain-wave-pat-1782730253

Gee........I wonder who has the ability to tap into this brain wave frequency? Any guesses?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/texting-produces-an-entirely-new-kind-of-brain-wave-pat-1782730253" rel="nofollow ugc">http://gizmodo.com/texting-produces-an-entirely-new-kind-of-brain-wave-pat-1782730253</a></p>
<p>Gee&#8230;&#8230;..I wonder who has the ability to tap into this brain wave frequency? Any guesses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stop Using Smartphones in Public		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128616</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stop Using Smartphones in Public]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 05:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-06-text-messaging-smartphones-triggers-brain.html

Notice this study appeared in &quot;Epilepsy and Behavior.&quot;

It&#039;s time to stop using your smart phone in public and exposing people to harmful frequencies. What you&#039;re doing to yourself when you text on your smart phone should remain a private matter.

Nancy Baer, Co-founder, Sedona Smart Meter Awareness]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-06-text-messaging-smartphones-triggers-brain.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-06-text-messaging-smartphones-triggers-brain.html</a></p>
<p>Notice this study appeared in &#8220;Epilepsy and Behavior.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to stop using your smart phone in public and exposing people to harmful frequencies. What you&#8217;re doing to yourself when you text on your smart phone should remain a private matter.</p>
<p>Nancy Baer, Co-founder, Sedona Smart Meter Awareness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: N. Baer		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128569</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N. Baer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[TALKING POINTS FOR SEDONA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6/28 AGENDA ITEM 8B, 4:30 PM SEDONA CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 102 Roadrunner Drive, Sedona, AZ 86336 If you cannot be present, please send an email for distribution to Council members to &quot;SIrvine@sedonaaz.gov&quot; and ask her distribute it:

1.  APS states that these fees are needed to “recover costs of manual meter readings.”  APS, however, fails to list and enumerate their cost savings from firing several hundred manual meter readers, and the associated fuel, maintenance, and repair costs of the vehicles they previously used to make manual meter readings of several hundred thousand APS customers.

2.  Additionally, those of us who were aware they could, comprising 30% of Sedona’s population, have maintained our analog electronic meters, so APS never installed smart meters unless it was without home owners’ consents.

3.  These cost savings should more than offset any costs of manually reading the meters of the few thousand customers who opted out. 

Thank you!
Nancy, Co-Founder, Sedona Smart Meter Awareness

Sent from my hardwired computer with all wireless functions turned OFF]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TALKING POINTS FOR SEDONA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6/28 AGENDA ITEM 8B, 4:30 PM SEDONA CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 102 Roadrunner Drive, Sedona, AZ 86336 If you cannot be present, please send an email for distribution to Council members to &#8220;SIrvine@sedonaaz.gov&#8221; and ask her distribute it:</p>
<p>1.  APS states that these fees are needed to “recover costs of manual meter readings.”  APS, however, fails to list and enumerate their cost savings from firing several hundred manual meter readers, and the associated fuel, maintenance, and repair costs of the vehicles they previously used to make manual meter readings of several hundred thousand APS customers.</p>
<p>2.  Additionally, those of us who were aware they could, comprising 30% of Sedona’s population, have maintained our analog electronic meters, so APS never installed smart meters unless it was without home owners’ consents.</p>
<p>3.  These cost savings should more than offset any costs of manually reading the meters of the few thousand customers who opted out. </p>
<p>Thank you!<br />
Nancy, Co-Founder, Sedona Smart Meter Awareness</p>
<p>Sent from my hardwired computer with all wireless functions turned OFF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 30% of Sedona residents Opted Out		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[30% of Sedona residents Opted Out]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sedona residents need to remember that 30% of us, including businessess, had opted out and never had our analog meters removed!! There should not be any $70 &quot;set-up&quot; fee applicable http://www.sedonasmartmeterawareness.com/SMART-METER-FREE-BUSINESSES.html. Be sure to let City Council know to vote against APS proposals!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sedona residents need to remember that 30% of us, including businessess, had opted out and never had our analog meters removed!! There should not be any $70 &#8220;set-up&#8221; fee applicable <a href="http://www.sedonasmartmeterawareness.com/SMART-METER-FREE-BUSINESSES.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.sedonasmartmeterawareness.com/SMART-METER-FREE-BUSINESSES.html</a>. Be sure to let City Council know to vote against APS proposals!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: @Tracey in Nevada		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128517</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@Tracey in Nevada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 02:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Search cell tower on sedona eye. There is a lot of good information here. see below


https://sedonaeye.com/county-cell-towers-going-up-near-you/
also
www.whyfry.org
Power to the people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search cell tower on sedona eye. There is a lot of good information here. see below</p>
<p><a href="https://sedonaeye.com/county-cell-towers-going-up-near-you/" rel="ugc">https://sedonaeye.com/county-cell-towers-going-up-near-you/</a><br />
also<br />
<a href="http://www.whyfry.org" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.whyfry.org</a><br />
Power to the people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: To Tracie		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[To Tracie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is not necessarily true that cities can not have input about where cell towers are placed fortunately. Here&#039;s a good reference as to where cell tower construction has been defeated and I&#039;d be surprised if it didn&#039;t take heavy citizen participation to achieve positive results, as with anything if enough people get involved and complain, things CAN and WILL change:
http://www.celltowerdangers.org/defeated-cell-towers.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not necessarily true that cities can not have input about where cell towers are placed fortunately. Here&#8217;s a good reference as to where cell tower construction has been defeated and I&#8217;d be surprised if it didn&#8217;t take heavy citizen participation to achieve positive results, as with anything if enough people get involved and complain, things CAN and WILL change:<br />
<a href="http://www.celltowerdangers.org/defeated-cell-towers.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.celltowerdangers.org/defeated-cell-towers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracey Burkeholder, Nevada		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracey Burkeholder, Nevada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your headline email arrived yesterday and its packed with interesting reads and information. Q? If it&#039;s unlikely to avoid towers and with governments profiting from and promoting our ill health by approving them, can the average home sue their local representatives or use a civil or class action suit? Organizing or encouraging not to have smart meters is one piece, but it doesn&#039;t tackle the continued problems. Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your headline email arrived yesterday and its packed with interesting reads and information. Q? If it&#8217;s unlikely to avoid towers and with governments profiting from and promoting our ill health by approving them, can the average home sue their local representatives or use a civil or class action suit? Organizing or encouraging not to have smart meters is one piece, but it doesn&#8217;t tackle the continued problems. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alarmed		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alarmed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In addition to the three mandatory demand charges--wedded to usage times--the APS rate case filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission on June 1, 2016 (Docket E-01345A-16-0036) seeks fees to recover manual meter reading costs from those who opted out of smart meters. 

APS concludes the total stated base rate increase is 15%, and the net customer bill impact is 5.74%.

The egregious opt-out fees APS requested: 

$70 one-time set-up fee
$15 per month meter-reading-fee

Item 8.b. on the Tuesday, June 28, 2016 Regular City Council Agenda states: &quot;Discussion on this matter is intended to elicit direction from Council on what, if any, role the City of Sedona may take in the rate case, either directly or indirectly.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the three mandatory demand charges&#8211;wedded to usage times&#8211;the APS rate case filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission on June 1, 2016 (Docket E-01345A-16-0036) seeks fees to recover manual meter reading costs from those who opted out of smart meters. </p>
<p>APS concludes the total stated base rate increase is 15%, and the net customer bill impact is 5.74%.</p>
<p>The egregious opt-out fees APS requested: </p>
<p>$70 one-time set-up fee<br />
$15 per month meter-reading-fee</p>
<p>Item 8.b. on the Tuesday, June 28, 2016 Regular City Council Agenda states: &#8220;Discussion on this matter is intended to elicit direction from Council on what, if any, role the City of Sedona may take in the rate case, either directly or indirectly.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: N. Baer		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cell-phone-studies-and-how-the-blood-brain-barrier-is-penetrated/comment-page-1/#comment-128446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N. Baer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53855#comment-128446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Response from AZ AARP regarding APS Demand Charge Proposal.
 
- Check out the national policy:

  &quot;AARP utilities advocacy here in Arizona must be, as elsewhere, in compliance with AARP’s national policy and our local resource limitations. AARP’s national utility policy, available online at http://policybook.aarp.org/, Chapter 10 “Utilities: Telecommunications, Energy and Other Services” includes the following:

Policymakers should prohibit mandatory or opt-out time-of-use metering and billing program. Policymakers in states that adopt an opt-out approach should ensure the following protections:

Residential customers should be able to opt-out of having a smart meter installed. Customers who opt out of a smart meter should either retain their current analog meter OR receive a non-communicating digital meter, depending on which option policymakers deem to be most cost effective.
 
A utility should have the opportunity to recover from customers who opt out of smart meters only the just and reasonable costs that result from their decision, as long as those costs have not already been recovered in rates and the utility has taken steps to minimize their costs. Cost recovery should be in the form of a one-time fee (if a field visit is required) and a monthly meter- reading fee to reflect the non-standard meter-reading process.
 
The initial cost charged to customers who opt-out should incorporate the so-called “exit fee” that would cover any costs, not already included in rates, that are incurred when terminating service at a location so that the next customer of record will not incur additional charges to install a smart meter upon request.
 
A lower cost for implementing the opt-out meter option should be provided for low-income customers that are identified through the utilityʼs existing low-income ratepayer assistance program or, where such programs are not available, through a customer’s participation in LIHEAP.
 
The approved opt-out program should be conspicuously disclosed to all customers prior to installation of a smart meter, and through additional educational materials for those customers whose meter has already been installed.
 
At this time AARP’s utility advocacy priority here in Arizona is defeating the proposed mandatory demand charge in the current APS rate case, the voluminous case you too referenced in your email. AARP believes this first in the nation mandatory demand charge will make utility bills unpredictable and reduce residential consumers ability to control their electric expenses to 1/3 of their bill. A particularly serious aspect to those on fixed incomes. Mandatory demand charges, should APS succeed in getting them approved, will apply to approximately 1 million APS customers, and may trigger approval in other states.

Nancy, Co-Founder Sedona Smart Meter Awareness


Sent from my hardwired computer with all wireless functions turned OFF]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response from AZ AARP regarding APS Demand Charge Proposal.</p>
<p>&#8211; Check out the national policy:</p>
<p>  &#8220;AARP utilities advocacy here in Arizona must be, as elsewhere, in compliance with AARP’s national policy and our local resource limitations. AARP’s national utility policy, available online at <a href="http://policybook.aarp.org/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://policybook.aarp.org/</a>, Chapter 10 “Utilities: Telecommunications, Energy and Other Services” includes the following:</p>
<p>Policymakers should prohibit mandatory or opt-out time-of-use metering and billing program. Policymakers in states that adopt an opt-out approach should ensure the following protections:</p>
<p>Residential customers should be able to opt-out of having a smart meter installed. Customers who opt out of a smart meter should either retain their current analog meter OR receive a non-communicating digital meter, depending on which option policymakers deem to be most cost effective.</p>
<p>A utility should have the opportunity to recover from customers who opt out of smart meters only the just and reasonable costs that result from their decision, as long as those costs have not already been recovered in rates and the utility has taken steps to minimize their costs. Cost recovery should be in the form of a one-time fee (if a field visit is required) and a monthly meter- reading fee to reflect the non-standard meter-reading process.</p>
<p>The initial cost charged to customers who opt-out should incorporate the so-called “exit fee” that would cover any costs, not already included in rates, that are incurred when terminating service at a location so that the next customer of record will not incur additional charges to install a smart meter upon request.</p>
<p>A lower cost for implementing the opt-out meter option should be provided for low-income customers that are identified through the utilityʼs existing low-income ratepayer assistance program or, where such programs are not available, through a customer’s participation in LIHEAP.</p>
<p>The approved opt-out program should be conspicuously disclosed to all customers prior to installation of a smart meter, and through additional educational materials for those customers whose meter has already been installed.</p>
<p>At this time AARP’s utility advocacy priority here in Arizona is defeating the proposed mandatory demand charge in the current APS rate case, the voluminous case you too referenced in your email. AARP believes this first in the nation mandatory demand charge will make utility bills unpredictable and reduce residential consumers ability to control their electric expenses to 1/3 of their bill. A particularly serious aspect to those on fixed incomes. Mandatory demand charges, should APS succeed in getting them approved, will apply to approximately 1 million APS customers, and may trigger approval in other states.</p>
<p>Nancy, Co-Founder Sedona Smart Meter Awareness</p>
<p>Sent from my hardwired computer with all wireless functions turned OFF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
