Throughout the articles regarding SFD and the Recall it is interesting that there seems to be a peanut gallery of named individuals as well as individuals hiding behind pseudonyms and projected anonymity that consistently resorts to childish name calling and off topic accusations.

It is obvious that a nerve has been struck and a button has been pushed by those who have come forward to present alternative information and the peanut gallery has little to offer in response other than their elementary behavior.

The peanut gallery’s obvious lack of ability to offer any facts of rebuttal, their continual inability to refute the presented information and documentation or substantiate their claims that Tony, and other supporting voices, are lying makes it obvious that the peanut gallery are finding it difficult to argue when Tony and his supporting voices don’t stop making sense.

…Hence their having to repeatedly resort to immature diversion tactics and avoidance of providing answers to the questions presented, offering only their childish responses, bullying tactics and ludicrous out lashings towards other members of the public who also contribute comments and input.

I am shocked that anyone who would be reading the articles and subsequent comments, contributions and viewpoints would agree with a peanut gallery who consistently feel the need to resort to such immaturity, lack of sense and incapability to present sound proof or supporting information to their claims.

Obviously the peanut gallery’s ignorance, bigotry and immaturity cannot be compensated for.

There is quite a lot of information circulating these days, I know I have made every effort to study and compare what is available, to see what has been presented as fact and which facts are supported by sound documentation. The best any of us can hope for is an informed decision at the voting polls. As it has been stated by several people – it is up to each of us to vote …. vote wisely indeed.

“To whom you are actually referring to.” ???? Try “…to whom you are referring.” or “to whom you actually refer.” You’re (you are) not a person to whom I would refer anyone for grammar and/or punctuation lessons. Stick to that at which you excel. Oh… what IS that, by the way?

The SFD Recall election has become a lively subject that seems to have polarized many.

People say crazy things. Facts are supported by documentation.

Tell a story….

or,

Just ’cause you heard it…

Gossip or second-hand information is always inaccurate.

Rich Collister states above that it is the coward who hides and lies on this blog using only your first name (or in your case solely the last).

Feel free to publish your full name and while you’re at it, place a name where you’ve utilized replacement nouns (ie: to whom you are actually referring to when you state “your girlfriend”).

Oh, and by the way perhaps you should learn some grammatical sense as well – spell check is great but it doesn’t compensate for lack of understanding the English language. (Maybe I need to spell it out for you a bit more as to what I am referring to and “compare yours”):

Your: pronoun
1. (a form of the possessive case of you used as an attributive adjective): Your comment above. Compare yours.

VS:

You’re [yoor; unstressed yer]
contraction of you are, as in: You’re certain that’s right?

Speaking of lies, what do you drink make up this stuff?

Have you heard of lawsuit for slander? Unless you have proof of your last statement, you’d better retract it. Seeing as it is false, I think you now have a problem.

Now, give me your full name so you can be served.

If you can cite a lie and provide evidence, please do so. Morons and cowards accuse others of lying without proof.

My full name is Tony Tonsich.

Have a nice day!

As for you Tony, you my moron friend are the coward who hides and lies on this blog only using your first name!!