<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sedona Oak Creek Slide Rock Area to Get Cell Tower	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/sedona-oak-creek-slide-rock-area-to-get-cell-tower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/sedona-oak-creek-slide-rock-area-to-get-cell-tower/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cell Tower and Cell Phone Danger		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/sedona-oak-creek-slide-rock-area-to-get-cell-tower/comment-page-1/#comment-135782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cell Tower and Cell Phone Danger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=56149#comment-135782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified RF fields as &#039;possibly carcinogenic to humans,&#039;...&quot;

From American Cancer Society Website:
What expert agencies say About cell phone towers

The 3 expert agencies that usually classify cancer-causing exposures (carcinogens) – the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – have not classified cell phone towers specifically as to their cancer-causing potential.

About RF radiation

Some of the agencies that classify cancer-causing exposures have, however, made statements about radiofrequency radiation.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified RF fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” based on  limited evidence of a possible increase in risk for brain tumors among cell phone users, and inadequate evidence for other types of cancer. (For more information on the IARC classification system, see Known and Probable Human Carcinogens.) IARC also noted that exposure to the brain from RF fields from cell phone base stations (mounted on roofs or towers) is less than 1/100th the exposure to the brain from mobile devices such as cell phones.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified RF fields as &#8216;possibly carcinogenic to humans,&#8217;&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>From American Cancer Society Website:<br />
What expert agencies say About cell phone towers</p>
<p>The 3 expert agencies that usually classify cancer-causing exposures (carcinogens) – the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – have not classified cell phone towers specifically as to their cancer-causing potential.</p>
<p>About RF radiation</p>
<p>Some of the agencies that classify cancer-causing exposures have, however, made statements about radiofrequency radiation.</p>
<p>The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified RF fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” based on  limited evidence of a possible increase in risk for brain tumors among cell phone users, and inadequate evidence for other types of cancer. (For more information on the IARC classification system, see Known and Probable Human Carcinogens.) IARC also noted that exposure to the brain from RF fields from cell phone base stations (mounted on roofs or towers) is less than 1/100th the exposure to the brain from mobile devices such as cell phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
