Comments on: Sedona Council Raises Sewer Rate

By: H.T.

H.T. — Mon, 05 Sep 2016 16:49:06 +0000

Good idea, fill time slots at council meetings with science about wastewater injection issues. Fill time slots with questions about agenda items. Smart meters. It’s videotaped. Get the Councilors on record about everything.

By: Brewer

Brewer — Mon, 05 Sep 2016 16:37:07 +0000

Reason Council doesn’t want to spray is they want to develop. A Conflict. Duh. Happy Labor Day.

By: @Sharlett

@Sharlett — Mon, 05 Sep 2016 04:28:31 +0000

I don’t know if what you’re saying it true but it make a lot of sense.

Instead of spouting off on SI why don’t you tell one of those new city councilors that we just voted into office and lets see what they’re made of. Or better yet, why not take a 3 minute period at a council meeting and tell everyone, if what you’re saying is true of course.

By: Bad JuJu Redux

Bad JuJu Redux — Mon, 05 Sep 2016 03:23:56 +0000

whiny lin ennis back then & whiny sharlett today whine whine whine on https://sedonaeye.com/wastewater-rates-increased-by-sedona-city-council/

By: sharlett

sharlett — Mon, 05 Sep 2016 01:20:47 +0000

Really need to change the topic of the above: Why?

Because our City Manager and Staff and Council, over the years, have set their financial approval, votes and direction towards Injection Wells for our sewer treated effluent disposal system….right?

Do we also recall the cost of those “injection” wells that council approved?

Now, in Oklahoma, where they just had a 5.7 earthquake and many aftermath quakes…….they, in this short period of time, determined that their wastewater injection wells are why they suffered the earthquakes.

so my point is that we are paying for injection wells to be tested and constructed and we had an earthquake here several months ago….that rocked and rolled my home.

I suggest we just keep spraying the treated effluent as it harms no one and we surly don’t need development or tourism or what ever on the lands that we need to continue to Spray our treated effluent on.

By: Cody K/Denis L

Cody K/Denis L — Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:02:29 +0000

Somebody did care!

SedonaEye.com Election Central Results for Sedona City Council and Mayor Preliminary Vote Result says:
August 30, 2016 at 11:20 pm

SEDONA COUNCIL MEMBER – 4-YEAR TERM
Number of Precincts
2
Precincts Reporting
2
Vote For 3

CURRIVAN, JOHN (NP)
640
23.90%
MARTINEZ, JOHN (NP)
680
25.39%
VERNIER, JOE (NP)
695
25.95%
WILLIAMSON, JESSICA (NP)
631
23.56%
Write-In
32
1.19%
2,678
Total Votes
100.00%

SEDONA COUNCIL MEMBER – 2-YEAR TERM
Number of Precincts
2
Precincts Reporting
2
Vote For 1
LAMKIN, TOM (NP)
528
54.89%
MAYER, GERHARD (NP)
432
44.91%
Write-In
2
0.21%
962
Total Votes
100.00%

SEDONA MAYOR
Number of Precincts
2
Precincts Reporting
2
Vote For 1
MORIARTY, SANDRA J “SANDY”
(NP)
812
95.31%
Write-In
40
4.69%
852
Total Votes
100.00%

By: N. Baer

N. Baer — Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:29:08 +0000

Too bad and so sad about Council’s mis-actions. I sure hope early voters have remembered all the waste of time and money when casting ballot for “new” council.

By: Jess Lookin

Jess Lookin — Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:33:18 +0000

What, no comments from those with their hand in the till?

No comment Jennifer? No comment Steve? No comment Karen? Could the Sedona chamber survive without the $2,000,000 from the City? If so, they should return the money and balance the city budget.

By: Norma

Norma — Sun, 28 Aug 2016 17:50:19 +0000

Thank you Jean for letting us know. We need and appreciate you. Thank you for this article on Sedonaeye!

By: Donna L

Donna L — Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:35:17 +0000

Transparency? Right. With each other, not us.