<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sedona 2010 Census Numbers Released	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/sedona-2010-census-numbers-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/sedona-2010-census-numbers-released/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/sedona-2010-census-numbers-released/comment-page-1/#comment-7058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=12458#comment-7058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[the jockeying begins for big park to oust sedona city in its delusions of grandeur by getting its own supervisor^^^^yea righto big park your tourists beat paths to voc &amp; sedona lucks out to get your leftover tourist trickle down~all the april fools live in voc because like we w/IQs know, voc is sedona&#039;s other page springs w/o good wine producing vineyards^^^^voc political knobheads better factor in losses to real estate values &amp; commercial rents^^^]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the jockeying begins for big park to oust sedona city in its delusions of grandeur by getting its own supervisor^^^^yea righto big park your tourists beat paths to voc &#038; sedona lucks out to get your leftover tourist trickle down~all the april fools live in voc because like we w/IQs know, voc is sedona&#8217;s other page springs w/o good wine producing vineyards^^^^voc political knobheads better factor in losses to real estate values &#038; commercial rents^^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Darlene		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/sedona-2010-census-numbers-released/comment-page-1/#comment-6952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darlene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=12458#comment-6952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[read this and it wasn&#039;t until the evening news out of phoenix that we heard the same figures and couldn&#039;t find the information anywhere else!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read this and it wasn&#8217;t until the evening news out of phoenix that we heard the same figures and couldn&#8217;t find the information anywhere else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Editor Update		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/sedona-2010-census-numbers-released/comment-page-1/#comment-6948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=12458#comment-6948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some additional 2010 Arizona Census information:

An Arizona county reporting a LOSS in population: Greenlee (2010 reported population 8,437) while three Arizona counties grew in the 5-15% range: Graham (population of 37,220), Cochise (population of 131,346), and Navajo (107,449).

Here is the breakdown of reported 2010 Arizona population distribution by county: 

Apache     (71,518)
Navajo      (107,449)
Coconino   (134,421)(grew slightly less than 25%) 
Mohave     (200,186)
La Paz       (20,489)
Yuma        (195,751)
Maricopa    (3,817,117)
Gila           (53,597)(grew under 5%)
Pinal          (375,770)
Pima          (980,263)
Graham      (37,220)
Santa Cruz (47,420)
Cochise      (131,346)
Greenlee     (8,437)
Yavapai      (211,033)(grew slightly more than 25%) 

Since the 2000 Census, Arizona increased by 46% Hispanic and or Latino population and 17% not Hispanic or Latino. 

Almost 12% for the 2010 Arizona Census identified as &quot;some other race&quot; while 3.4% identified with being bi-racial or of more than two races. 

Asians account for 2.8% of those identifying with the Census form option, while 4.6% chose to be identified as American Indian or Native Alaskan. Among other races one might indicate on the 2010 Arizona census form, 4.1% chose to identify as Black and 73% as White.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some additional 2010 Arizona Census information:</p>
<p>An Arizona county reporting a LOSS in population: Greenlee (2010 reported population 8,437) while three Arizona counties grew in the 5-15% range: Graham (population of 37,220), Cochise (population of 131,346), and Navajo (107,449).</p>
<p>Here is the breakdown of reported 2010 Arizona population distribution by county: </p>
<p>Apache     (71,518)<br />
Navajo      (107,449)<br />
Coconino   (134,421)(grew slightly less than 25%)<br />
Mohave     (200,186)<br />
La Paz       (20,489)<br />
Yuma        (195,751)<br />
Maricopa    (3,817,117)<br />
Gila           (53,597)(grew under 5%)<br />
Pinal          (375,770)<br />
Pima          (980,263)<br />
Graham      (37,220)<br />
Santa Cruz (47,420)<br />
Cochise      (131,346)<br />
Greenlee     (8,437)<br />
Yavapai      (211,033)(grew slightly more than 25%) </p>
<p>Since the 2000 Census, Arizona increased by 46% Hispanic and or Latino population and 17% not Hispanic or Latino. </p>
<p>Almost 12% for the 2010 Arizona Census identified as &#8220;some other race&#8221; while 3.4% identified with being bi-racial or of more than two races. </p>
<p>Asians account for 2.8% of those identifying with the Census form option, while 4.6% chose to be identified as American Indian or Native Alaskan. Among other races one might indicate on the 2010 Arizona census form, 4.1% chose to identify as Black and 73% as White.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
