Assistant City Manager
http://www.sedonaaz.gov/sedonacms/index.aspx?recordid=56&page=510

Assistant to City Manager
http://www.sedonaaz.gov/Sedonacms/index.aspx?recordid=58&page=510

“Maybe we can unload them to the City since they will soon be in the real estate business, or so it seems if the Housing Commission has their way.”

Yes, I hope everyone notices that the outfits advocating for YES on 420 will all have their rice bowls broken when a majority votes NO on 420.

Also there’s the matter of just who has $$$ to spend on “selling” this idea of “Home Rule.”

In addition to the bulk mailings from the city, there’s at least one other “paid for” ad in RRN 2/29. And then the Sedona Gallery Assn. and the Sedona Lodging Council, under the “logo” of the Sedona Chamber of Commerce has at least one ad in the RRN on 3/2 besides the Chamber’s “freebie” article “urging residents to vote yes on Prop. 420”.

It would be remiss not to mention the Mayor’s gratis “Guest Perspective” (2/29) advocating a “yes” vote on Prop. 420 and then the most recent grand-slam front page article tooting even louder.

Wonder where the RRN stands on this? Oh, forgot . . . that was blatantly made public in one of their own editorials by Trista Steers MacVittle, Managing Editor.

So fellow residents, those of us with properties that aren’t under water one way or another, look on the bright side. Maybe we can unload them to the City since they will soon be in the real estate business, or so it seems if the Housing Commission has their way.

This makes me so mad that I want to move to where government has a real social agenda that has real intelligent people running it. GIVE US A BREAK City of Sedona! And cut that housing allowance for the city manager – it’s not necessary any longer and actually never was. NO, NO, NO to you people lining your pockets with money. NO TO HOME RULE. It’s time for some fiscal restraint by the City Dollars Gone Wild Spenders!

The city wants to do that even after they added big time to the traffic problems with the poor design of that section of 89A after they claimed ownership from ADOT? You can’t be serious?

Did we not just go through a very expensive ballot measure to undo another stupid decision? Will people actually vote to give these folks carte blanche for another spending spree?

Please someone, tell me this is only a nightmare and not a proposed reality.

Purchasing uptown acreage for a bypass; Purchasing houses and/or lots for “affordable housing;” Dreams of extending city limits to WW treatment plant and create some sort of Disney Like attraction out there???; Creek walk in a flood plane; Potential for city to own and operate Cultural Park to mention a few presently on the table.

Again the Red Rock News denied printing the other point of view in their latest front page article. Same old story.

Hey, kids, if you don’t apply the brakes by voting No on Prop. 420 it’s most likely you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

http://www.sedonaaz.gov/FTP/City%20Council/Archives/2009/2009%2004%2014/Meeting%20materials/06k-02_Sedona_CM_Emp_Agreement_final_draft.pdf