<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Monday Morning Coffee with Alejandro Gutierrez	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/monday-morning-coffee-with-alejandro-gutierrez-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/monday-morning-coffee-with-alejandro-gutierrez-12/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:25:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Climate change &#38; effect of disappearing red rocks?		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/monday-morning-coffee-with-alejandro-gutierrez-12/comment-page-1/#comment-156233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate change &#38; effect of disappearing red rocks?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 22:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=59533#comment-156233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for instance, compiled the pledges made by governments as part of the UN&#039;s “Paris” agreement plan, then compared the result with their own preexisting projections. 

MIT found that even assuming the warmist theory was correct, the Paris scheme would reduce temperature by some 0.2°C by the end of the century — a number too small to even properly measure at the global level. 

When they used UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projections from 2000, the researchers found no improvement, period. 

(To this I say...You can&#039;t argue with math. And why should the US be expected to pay trillions to the UN to find this out in 2020? Thank you MIT. I&#039;ll send a check to you instead. The rest of you people ought to donate too. You wanted to send it to the UN bureaucrats, spend it on our kids.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for instance, compiled the pledges made by governments as part of the UN&#8217;s “Paris” agreement plan, then compared the result with their own preexisting projections. </p>
<p>MIT found that even assuming the warmist theory was correct, the Paris scheme would reduce temperature by some 0.2°C by the end of the century — a number too small to even properly measure at the global level. </p>
<p>When they used UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projections from 2000, the researchers found no improvement, period. </p>
<p>(To this I say&#8230;You can&#8217;t argue with math. And why should the US be expected to pay trillions to the UN to find this out in 2020? Thank you MIT. I&#8217;ll send a check to you instead. The rest of you people ought to donate too. You wanted to send it to the UN bureaucrats, spend it on our kids.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
