<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Editorial Choices	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/editorial-choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/editorial-choices/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eddie Maddock		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/editorial-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie Maddock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sedonaverdevalleytimes.com/?p=778#comment-100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The answer to your question &quot;Do we play it safe or do we get it out?&quot; should be easy if one is objective.  An open minded reader most likely will appreciate the integrity of an editor and/or reporter who isn&#039;t afraid to allow equal time to subjects of issues.  Those who don&#039;t, in my opinion, are shallow cowards and do little, if anything, to uphold the integrity of journalism. Ultimately, does anyone benefit from hiding in the shadows?  
By all means, &quot;get it out&quot;.  The other choice for readers is obvious.  Change publications.
Your article in a nutshell:  &quot;It doesn&#039;t get any better than this.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to your question &#8220;Do we play it safe or do we get it out?&#8221; should be easy if one is objective.  An open minded reader most likely will appreciate the integrity of an editor and/or reporter who isn&#8217;t afraid to allow equal time to subjects of issues.  Those who don&#8217;t, in my opinion, are shallow cowards and do little, if anything, to uphold the integrity of journalism. Ultimately, does anyone benefit from hiding in the shadows?<br />
By all means, &#8220;get it out&#8221;.  The other choice for readers is obvious.  Change publications.<br />
Your article in a nutshell:  &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t get any better than this.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
