Now although Mr. Gehlbach lost that battle he has the courage to toss himself into the lion’s den once again. However this go-around offers a total of four in the competition. After having reviewed profiles on the four candidates he appears to be the ONLY one who actually grasps Sedona’s form of government.

But even more important his emphasis on RESIDENTS stands out like a foreign concept to past city councils and local government policy. In both articles on Sedona Eye during the 2020 election Mr. Steve Segner was a major contributor to the 103 comments generated by just this one article in his successful attempt to attack Gehlbach.

So be prepared, especially with the new questionable information and false commentary tossed out daily on Social Media. Remember this is an opportunity for a major a change in the direction of local government policy providing Sedona “legitimate” residents make it happen.

Therefore let the games begin – AGAIN

The residents, fugget about um. They don’t pay enough.

Reminds you of a mob organization doesn’t it?

Ask the City if they will pay you for your extra parking spaces.

It is nuts, the city paying tourist businesses to use their parking lots for, wait for it, TOURISTS !!!

Oh yes, the several hundred dollar they got now make them a slave to the city.
Im sure they sold their editorial coverage for for rent on a parking space.

As you say, on the weekends the lot is full so all of those folks received free parking so now they can come and shop without having to worry about feeding the meter, and can shop in mine and my neighbors’ shops????

You find this to be a bad thing because why????

I’m guessing that you have nothing invested in the city and just like to complain. IMO you should go hiking and quit your bi-ching

I never see anyone parking in the RR news parking lot. Even on a holiday weekend. Has the city ever justified or checked the usage or need? NO they haven’t. It’s all a kickback to keep them reporting one sided propaganda.

Just Like the Fire District payment for the use of their lot. PEOPLE don’t park there. Wasting our money. Vote buying IMO

Just like the city using the local rag for public notices and ads. The State changed the LAW the city isn’t required to print in the local rag. The CC council voted to keep paying the snooze even through they are NOT required to do so.

I wonder if it could affect their reporting?

And, for that matter, why wouldn’t “free” use of that property (if that in fact is the case) be considered as a payback for the discretionary bed tax increase, focus of the highly contentious city/chamber of commerce contract? That funding has amounted to millions of dollars to the chamber without benefit of authenticate accountability of return on investment, if factually there ever was any except to the C of C versus city and/or residents!

Many more questions continue to pop-up as this mysterious arrangement moves through various stages. (currently directed at “sustainability”?)

Pea You said the skunk to the Out House!