Comments on: Dear Editor: No Highway Takeback!

By: P. Revere

P. Revere — Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:34:29 +0000

I agree that we need to take a larger view of this issue. Allowing cities/towns to take back highways that run through their centers is a national trend because financing infrastructure has crumbled.

See Paul Krugman’s article that recently appeared in the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/09/opinion/09krugman.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

By: Cliff, Sedona AZ

Cliff, Sedona AZ — Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:09:56 +0000

Looks like Liz is so full of misinformation that she can’t event see straight. Her numbers are so out of wack its incredible. Must be friends of City Councilors who were just thrown out of office. You know who you are.

By: magickj

magickj — Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:10:18 +0000

Ok, don’t take it back. But don’t install those obnoxious lights. I don’t like these games, and that is clearly all it is — Adot is telling Sedona, my way or the highway. We don’t need no stinking lights on 89A, or the utility bill to run them. What we DO have to look at right now, in the dead in the water KFC building. Whether ADOT or Sedona has the highway, that property will remain a blight until real estate and commercial real estate in particular improves. It could be like that for the next 30 years… and it won’t be ADOT’s problem. Come on, people, we’ve got bigger fish to fry as the economy implodes.

By: Cassobe

Cassobe — Wed, 11 Aug 2010 03:51:22 +0000

Dear Liz,
Scare Tactics, Scare Tactics. Where on Earth did You get Your misinformation from? Perhaps You should read more, and write less.

By: mike schroeder

mike schroeder — Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:10:51 +0000

I do not understand how anyone can throw figures around before the council does their due diligence and presents their facts to the city residents. Throwing around unsubstantiated numbers based on assumptions and rumors is irresponsible. That’s why we got rid of the last council.