<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Council Terminates Public Input on Sedona National Monument	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 14:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JeanJ		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-120910</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JeanJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 14:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-120910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Just Sayin&#039;

You don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about. If you check your facts, you will find &quot;only $5K&quot; is incorrect. 

Although the Yavapai Big Brothers &#038; Big Sisters had originally asked for $10,000 they received less. On Sept 8, 2015, the City Council voted 7 to 0 to approve the amount of $8,000. Since it got funded from General Fund Contingency money, the $8,000 amount was in addition to the $150,000 granted to the other beggar groups on July 28, 2015 under the City&#039;s Small Grants Program for FY 2015-2016. STAFF: Karen Daines.

BTW, I read my scribbly notes incorrectly and picked up the amount originally requested ($10,000) vice the amount received on Sept 8 ($8,000).  I thought General Fund Contingency dollars were for future emergencies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Just Sayin&#8217;</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about. If you check your facts, you will find &#8220;only $5K&#8221; is incorrect. </p>
<p>Although the Yavapai Big Brothers &amp; Big Sisters had originally asked for $10,000 they received less. On Sept 8, 2015, the City Council voted 7 to 0 to approve the amount of $8,000. Since it got funded from General Fund Contingency money, the $8,000 amount was in addition to the $150,000 granted to the other beggar groups on July 28, 2015 under the City&#8217;s Small Grants Program for FY 2015-2016. STAFF: Karen Daines.</p>
<p>BTW, I read my scribbly notes incorrectly and picked up the amount originally requested ($10,000) vice the amount received on Sept 8 ($8,000).  I thought General Fund Contingency dollars were for future emergencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Just Sayin'		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-120900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Just Sayin']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 05:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-120900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ JeanJ

Please check your facts, I believe that Big Bro&#039;s at first received nothing and then only $5k. You must feel that you HAVE to look like you know what youre talking about, all of the time. Opp&#039;s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ JeanJ</p>
<p>Please check your facts, I believe that Big Bro&#8217;s at first received nothing and then only $5k. You must feel that you HAVE to look like you know what youre talking about, all of the time. Opp&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wes		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-120898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 05:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-120898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To: Angelina Muñoz Smith, Miami-Globe - Please get your concepts and issues straight before you start ranting.  There is so much discourse and confusion about true politician issues and then how you want to attempt to switch issues to you.....opps on your part!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To: Angelina Muñoz Smith, Miami-Globe &#8211; Please get your concepts and issues straight before you start ranting.  There is so much discourse and confusion about true politician issues and then how you want to attempt to switch issues to you&#8230;..opps on your part!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JeanJ		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-120889</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JeanJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-120889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Jess Lookin. Thanks for suggesting reading the Sedona Budget. 

For the unaware, the Final Budget Public Hearing for this year was held on June 23, 2015, but the proposed FY 2015-16 Annual Budget Document was missing. The City Council voted 6 to 0 for adoption anyway--to include the ? budget attachments.

The adopted 2015-16 Annual Budget Document was eventually prepared and posted on the Finance Dept&#039;s web pages on or about October 29, 2015. Is this the  &quot;exemplary municipal service&quot; the mission statement the City of Sedona government claims?

Of the approximately $2.5 Million in handouts, the Chamber of Commerce received $1.5 Million of scarce taxpayer dollars. Some out-of-town recipients:

Hummingbird Society (VOC): $6,000
Northern Arizona Restorative Justice: $6,000
NAU Philosophy in the Public Interest: $5,000
Verde Valley Caregivers Coalition: $8,000
Verde Valley Sanctuary: $5,000
Yavapai Big Brothers &#038; Sisters: $10,000
ETC.

According to Citizen Engagement Coordinator Lauren Browne, the appointed work group consisted of Stephanie Giesbrect, Chair; Laura Levy-Mauer, Vice Chair; Connie Levinson; Larry Lineberry; and Jane McGraw.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jess Lookin. Thanks for suggesting reading the Sedona Budget. </p>
<p>For the unaware, the Final Budget Public Hearing for this year was held on June 23, 2015, but the proposed FY 2015-16 Annual Budget Document was missing. The City Council voted 6 to 0 for adoption anyway&#8211;to include the ? budget attachments.</p>
<p>The adopted 2015-16 Annual Budget Document was eventually prepared and posted on the Finance Dept&#8217;s web pages on or about October 29, 2015. Is this the  &#8220;exemplary municipal service&#8221; the mission statement the City of Sedona government claims?</p>
<p>Of the approximately $2.5 Million in handouts, the Chamber of Commerce received $1.5 Million of scarce taxpayer dollars. Some out-of-town recipients:</p>
<p>Hummingbird Society (VOC): $6,000<br />
Northern Arizona Restorative Justice: $6,000<br />
NAU Philosophy in the Public Interest: $5,000<br />
Verde Valley Caregivers Coalition: $8,000<br />
Verde Valley Sanctuary: $5,000<br />
Yavapai Big Brothers &amp; Sisters: $10,000<br />
ETC.</p>
<p>According to Citizen Engagement Coordinator Lauren Browne, the appointed work group consisted of Stephanie Giesbrect, Chair; Laura Levy-Mauer, Vice Chair; Connie Levinson; Larry Lineberry; and Jane McGraw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alarmed		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-120879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alarmed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 20:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-120879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[David Reyburn states &quot;THREE members had submitted cards to speak on an [9/23/2015] agenda item, yet all THREE were REFUSED their request for Public Input by the Mayor of Sedona.&quot;

This is an abuse of power. The City of Sedona is a City Manager form of government. The Mayor cannot refuse Public Input. An affirmative vote of the Council is required to do this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Reyburn states &#8220;THREE members had submitted cards to speak on an [9/23/2015] agenda item, yet all THREE were REFUSED their request for Public Input by the Mayor of Sedona.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is an abuse of power. The City of Sedona is a City Manager form of government. The Mayor cannot refuse Public Input. An affirmative vote of the Council is required to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shanel		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-120218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shanel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-120218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[kids trouble in schools bc they dont work bc meth horse bc sexed all up all the time bc costs parents $ get out of jail drugs drinking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kids trouble in schools bc they dont work bc meth horse bc sexed all up all the time bc costs parents $ get out of jail drugs drinking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Angelina Muñoz Smith, Miami-Globe		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-120042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angelina Muñoz Smith, Miami-Globe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-120042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We read you here. Was that comment to be a slap in Latina Latino Hispanic Indian African Anglo mixed race faces? We believe like this. We&#039;re badly labeled. Not all tribes have controlled by councils, not every immigrant have issues with quotas visas laws, not all dreamers are angels because lots are lazy and gangbangers and troublemakers lacking respect, majority of Arizonans of Mexican and mixed descents prefers to be called Americans. We need to raise our voices and be heard speaking. We need a representing majority of us and not listening and repeating words of people saying there leaders but not. We are not liking government owning our lands like in old countries when people couldn&#039;t own lands only rich and governments, call (deleted by editor) to (deleted by editor) learn (deleted by editor) cell (deleted by editor).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We read you here. Was that comment to be a slap in Latina Latino Hispanic Indian African Anglo mixed race faces? We believe like this. We&#8217;re badly labeled. Not all tribes have controlled by councils, not every immigrant have issues with quotas visas laws, not all dreamers are angels because lots are lazy and gangbangers and troublemakers lacking respect, majority of Arizonans of Mexican and mixed descents prefers to be called Americans. We need to raise our voices and be heard speaking. We need a representing majority of us and not listening and repeating words of people saying there leaders but not. We are not liking government owning our lands like in old countries when people couldn&#8217;t own lands only rich and governments, call (deleted by editor) to (deleted by editor) learn (deleted by editor) cell (deleted by editor).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J. J.		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-119687</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-119687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EXCUSE ME, SS ? !

I am NOT a participant in any T party. This is NOT about anti-fed government - this is about people with HUGE egos trying to appointment themselves local dictator of Verde Valley! THIS is NOT a democratic process - and in NO way does it reflect the needs or wants of 80% of the Verde Valley population.

It&#039;s that simple.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCUSE ME, SS ? !</p>
<p>I am NOT a participant in any T party. This is NOT about anti-fed government &#8211; this is about people with HUGE egos trying to appointment themselves local dictator of Verde Valley! THIS is NOT a democratic process &#8211; and in NO way does it reflect the needs or wants of 80% of the Verde Valley population.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: steve Segner		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-119682</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve Segner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-119682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Joe D . you got it, it is a t party thing anti Federal gov.  that simple  steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe D . you got it, it is a t party thing anti Federal gov.  that simple  steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J. J.		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/council-terminates-public-input-on-sedona-national-monument/comment-page-1/#comment-119681</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=51035#comment-119681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is for you, Joe D:

The top 10 reasons we oppose the Sedona Verde Valley Red Rock National Monument designation:

1. National monument designations attract additional visitors and Sedona is already saturated with more visitors than roads can handle, especially Highway #179 and Oak Creek Canyon.

2. Increased use of roads, sewer, lack of parking, and traffic in residential neighborhoods will mean more maintenance costs. The federal government is not going to help out with these kinds of expenses. They are on private land.

3. This is not a legitimate public process and ‘Keep Sedona Beautiful’ has no authority to run a public process on management of federal lands.

4. KSB is attempting to fast track their proclamation past the Verde Valley/Sedona Community delivering it directly to the President’s desk hoping it will be included in the end-of-term New Monuments.

5. The public does not have enough information to make an informed decision. Our community needs more than a few short weeks to study the UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.

6. Within the proposed boundaries all cities and towns will become private inholdings. What are the consequences to over 16,000 residents?

7. What will be the impact to the 80,000 residents of the Sedona/Verde Valley? The NM designation could cause property values to rise and bring added costs which may push families out of the area.

8. Federal reserved water rights (obtained by designating NM) are immune from state water laws. In order to retain our water rights, that has to be put into the management plan, which we know takes about three years and several thousand dollars to implement. Some of the head waters that form the Oak Creek, Beaver Creek, and Verde River are all on this monument land.

9. Competing with all other National Monuments for possible available funds and grants is not a sound plan. That is the money source KSB is depending on to bring in the revenue that gated entrances generally do for National Monuments. The last few National Monuments have not received any funding.

10. The proposed monument will control EVERY access point IN and OUT of Sedona.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is for you, Joe D:</p>
<p>The top 10 reasons we oppose the Sedona Verde Valley Red Rock National Monument designation:</p>
<p>1. National monument designations attract additional visitors and Sedona is already saturated with more visitors than roads can handle, especially Highway #179 and Oak Creek Canyon.</p>
<p>2. Increased use of roads, sewer, lack of parking, and traffic in residential neighborhoods will mean more maintenance costs. The federal government is not going to help out with these kinds of expenses. They are on private land.</p>
<p>3. This is not a legitimate public process and ‘Keep Sedona Beautiful’ has no authority to run a public process on management of federal lands.</p>
<p>4. KSB is attempting to fast track their proclamation past the Verde Valley/Sedona Community delivering it directly to the President’s desk hoping it will be included in the end-of-term New Monuments.</p>
<p>5. The public does not have enough information to make an informed decision. Our community needs more than a few short weeks to study the UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.</p>
<p>6. Within the proposed boundaries all cities and towns will become private inholdings. What are the consequences to over 16,000 residents?</p>
<p>7. What will be the impact to the 80,000 residents of the Sedona/Verde Valley? The NM designation could cause property values to rise and bring added costs which may push families out of the area.</p>
<p>8. Federal reserved water rights (obtained by designating NM) are immune from state water laws. In order to retain our water rights, that has to be put into the management plan, which we know takes about three years and several thousand dollars to implement. Some of the head waters that form the Oak Creek, Beaver Creek, and Verde River are all on this monument land.</p>
<p>9. Competing with all other National Monuments for possible available funds and grants is not a sound plan. That is the money source KSB is depending on to bring in the revenue that gated entrances generally do for National Monuments. The last few National Monuments have not received any funding.</p>
<p>10. The proposed monument will control EVERY access point IN and OUT of Sedona.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
