<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CDC Issues Cell Phone Radiation Caution	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/cdc-issues-cell-phone-radiation-caution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cdc-issues-cell-phone-radiation-caution/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CDC cops out		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cdc-issues-cell-phone-radiation-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-64239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CDC cops out]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=40978#comment-64239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CDC Retracts its Precautionary Health Warning about Cell Phone Radiation

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a precautionary health warning about cell phone radiation on June 9, 2014 and retracted the warning ten weeks later.

 
PRLog - Aug. 20, 2014 - BERKELEY, Calif. -- On June 9th of this year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revised the three-year old “Frequently Asked Questions about Cell Phones and Your Health,” on its web site.

A week ago we issued a press release commending CDC for advising the public about the need for caution regarding cell phone radiation exposure, especially among children (“CDC Issues Precautionary Health Warnings about Cell Phone Radiation”; 8/13/2014; http://www.prlog.org/12359483).

CDC’s new precautionary warning policy was consistent with the policies of more than a dozen national health and radiation safety agencies in developed nations around the world.

Following our press release, Microwave News published a report about this important new policy development in the U.S. (“CDC Calls for Caution on Cell Phones”; 8/16/2014; http://microwavenews.com/news-center/cdc-endorses-precaution).

Today, the CDC updated the FAQs and removed the precautionary advice it published ten weeks earlier.

Approximately 100 experts on electromagnetic radiation and health have signed declarations that were submitted to the FCC calling for precaution. It’s likely these experts would unanimously support CDC’s precautionary warning (“FCC: 98 Scientific Experts Demand Stronger Regulation of Cellphone Radiation; 8/4/2014; http://../12355167)?

Knowing how much administrative oversight CDC typically provides its media relations unit, we doubt that the CDC’s new policy statements were simply a mistake. What influenced CDC to retract its June 9th policy statements on cell phone use?

Following are the responses that CDC altered to three of the questions in its cell phone FAQs (http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/cell_phones._FAQ.html ).

(1)  “Can using a cell phone cause cancer?”

June 9: “There is no scientific evidence that provides a definite answer to that question. Along with many organizations worldwide, we recommend caution in cell phone use. More research is needed before we know for sure if using cell phones causes cancer.”

August 20: “There is no scientific evidence that provides a definite answer to that question. Some organizations recommend caution in cell phone use. More research is needed before we know if using cell phones causes health effects.”

(2) Should people stop using cell phones?

June 9: “Scientific studies are ongoing. Someday cellphones may be found to cause health problems we are not aware of at this time. However it is also important to consider the benefits of cell phones. They can be valuable in an urgent or emergency situation – and even save lives.”

August 20: “At this time we do not have the science to link health problems to cell phone use. Scientific studies are underway to determine whether cell phone use may cause health effects. It is also important to consider the benefits of cell phones. Their use can be valuable in an urgent or emergency situation – and even save lives.”

(3) Do cell phones cause health problems in children?

June 9: &quot;It’s too soon to know for sure. Children who use cell phones – and continue to use them as they get older – are likely to be around RF for many years. If RF does cause health problems, kids who use cell phones may have a higher chance of developing these problems in the future.&quot;

August 20: “At this time we do not have the science to link health problems to cell phone use. Scientific studies are underway to determine whether cell phone use may cause health effects. It is also important to consider the benefits of cell phones. Their use can be valuable in an urgent or emergency situation – and even save lives.”


Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
http://www.saferemr.com/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CDC Retracts its Precautionary Health Warning about Cell Phone Radiation</p>
<p>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a precautionary health warning about cell phone radiation on June 9, 2014 and retracted the warning ten weeks later.</p>
<p>PRLog &#8211; Aug. 20, 2014 &#8211; BERKELEY, Calif. &#8212; On June 9th of this year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revised the three-year old “Frequently Asked Questions about Cell Phones and Your Health,” on its web site.</p>
<p>A week ago we issued a press release commending CDC for advising the public about the need for caution regarding cell phone radiation exposure, especially among children (“CDC Issues Precautionary Health Warnings about Cell Phone Radiation”; 8/13/2014; <a href="http://www.prlog.org/12359483" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.prlog.org/12359483</a>).</p>
<p>CDC’s new precautionary warning policy was consistent with the policies of more than a dozen national health and radiation safety agencies in developed nations around the world.</p>
<p>Following our press release, Microwave News published a report about this important new policy development in the U.S. (“CDC Calls for Caution on Cell Phones”; 8/16/2014; <a href="http://microwavenews.com/news-center/cdc-endorses-precaution" rel="nofollow ugc">http://microwavenews.com/news-center/cdc-endorses-precaution</a>).</p>
<p>Today, the CDC updated the FAQs and removed the precautionary advice it published ten weeks earlier.</p>
<p>Approximately 100 experts on electromagnetic radiation and health have signed declarations that were submitted to the FCC calling for precaution. It’s likely these experts would unanimously support CDC’s precautionary warning (“FCC: 98 Scientific Experts Demand Stronger Regulation of Cellphone Radiation; 8/4/2014; <a href="http://" rel="ugc">http://</a>../12355167)?</p>
<p>Knowing how much administrative oversight CDC typically provides its media relations unit, we doubt that the CDC’s new policy statements were simply a mistake. What influenced CDC to retract its June 9th policy statements on cell phone use?</p>
<p>Following are the responses that CDC altered to three of the questions in its cell phone FAQs (<a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/cell_phones._FAQ.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/cell_phones._FAQ.html</a> ).</p>
<p>(1)  “Can using a cell phone cause cancer?”</p>
<p>June 9: “There is no scientific evidence that provides a definite answer to that question. Along with many organizations worldwide, we recommend caution in cell phone use. More research is needed before we know for sure if using cell phones causes cancer.”</p>
<p>August 20: “There is no scientific evidence that provides a definite answer to that question. Some organizations recommend caution in cell phone use. More research is needed before we know if using cell phones causes health effects.”</p>
<p>(2) Should people stop using cell phones?</p>
<p>June 9: “Scientific studies are ongoing. Someday cellphones may be found to cause health problems we are not aware of at this time. However it is also important to consider the benefits of cell phones. They can be valuable in an urgent or emergency situation – and even save lives.”</p>
<p>August 20: “At this time we do not have the science to link health problems to cell phone use. Scientific studies are underway to determine whether cell phone use may cause health effects. It is also important to consider the benefits of cell phones. Their use can be valuable in an urgent or emergency situation – and even save lives.”</p>
<p>(3) Do cell phones cause health problems in children?</p>
<p>June 9: &#8220;It’s too soon to know for sure. Children who use cell phones – and continue to use them as they get older – are likely to be around RF for many years. If RF does cause health problems, kids who use cell phones may have a higher chance of developing these problems in the future.&#8221;</p>
<p>August 20: “At this time we do not have the science to link health problems to cell phone use. Scientific studies are underway to determine whether cell phone use may cause health effects. It is also important to consider the benefits of cell phones. Their use can be valuable in an urgent or emergency situation – and even save lives.”</p>
<p>Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.<br />
School of Public Health<br />
University of California, Berkeley</p>
<p>Electromagnetic Radiation Safety<br />
<a href="http://www.saferemr.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.saferemr.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elaine Brown		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cdc-issues-cell-phone-radiation-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-63088</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elaine Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=40978#comment-63088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here you go Corky!!! from the Republic of Texas!!!!

Send this to your &quot;friends and family&quot;....and remember &quot;more is better&quot; according to another wireless carrier.......

Robert C. Kane had been working as top developer inside Motorola for decades, developing mobile phones. He died from brain cancer a few years ago, not without leaving this planet with a message, which you can find in his book:

Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette
A historical and scientific perspective
Robert C. Kane

Excerpts from the book: This is for you Corky...

&quot;[W]e can expect that no warning of brain tissue destruction
would be provided to a cellular telephone user until the damage
was so extensive that the scalp, which absorbs very little
energy, sensed heating.&quot;

http://www.icems.eu/docs/Robert_C_Kane.pdf

When you place a cell phone to your head, it may spike some 217 times per second into your skull like a pneumatic hammer. 

Knowledge is Power
My best.
Elaine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you go Corky!!! from the Republic of Texas!!!!</p>
<p>Send this to your &#8220;friends and family&#8221;&#8230;.and remember &#8220;more is better&#8221; according to another wireless carrier&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Robert C. Kane had been working as top developer inside Motorola for decades, developing mobile phones. He died from brain cancer a few years ago, not without leaving this planet with a message, which you can find in his book:</p>
<p>Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette<br />
A historical and scientific perspective<br />
Robert C. Kane</p>
<p>Excerpts from the book: This is for you Corky&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;[W]e can expect that no warning of brain tissue destruction<br />
would be provided to a cellular telephone user until the damage<br />
was so extensive that the scalp, which absorbs very little<br />
energy, sensed heating.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icems.eu/docs/Robert_C_Kane.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.icems.eu/docs/Robert_C_Kane.pdf</a></p>
<p>When you place a cell phone to your head, it may spike some 217 times per second into your skull like a pneumatic hammer. </p>
<p>Knowledge is Power<br />
My best.<br />
Elaine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Corky Van Auken, Republic of Texas reader		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cdc-issues-cell-phone-radiation-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-63043</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corky Van Auken, Republic of Texas reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 04:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=40978#comment-63043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I was on a cell phone call for about 40 minutes with a relative in SoCal &#038; my left ear has been ringing ever since &#038; it&#039;s annoying. The reason I&#039;m bothering to comment is that I don&#039;t have ringing in my ears ever &#038; it&#039;s becoming less noticeable but it&#039;s not completely gone. I will get a cord and stop carrying it in my pocket. Thanks for the tips-sent this to a lot of friends and family like Verizon asks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I was on a cell phone call for about 40 minutes with a relative in SoCal &amp; my left ear has been ringing ever since &amp; it&#8217;s annoying. The reason I&#8217;m bothering to comment is that I don&#8217;t have ringing in my ears ever &amp; it&#8217;s becoming less noticeable but it&#8217;s not completely gone. I will get a cord and stop carrying it in my pocket. Thanks for the tips-sent this to a lot of friends and family like Verizon asks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elaine Brown		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/cdc-issues-cell-phone-radiation-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-62493</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elaine Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=40978#comment-62493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for printing this important news. 

As many of you are aware, there have been expansions going on on the cell towers in Sedona and the Village.
When they increase the height , they must go before local government and public because it will reach more homes . I notice now they are expanding the towers and area horizontally, not sure if local government is acting on that or simply allowing it.

Either way you are being pulsed with a 24/7 microwave radiation. Like the smart meter that 25% of residents opted out of. Very smart. Same microwave radiation.

There are plans for more towers every two miles and Cottonwood just approved two 90 footers right in the middle of the city. Yuk.

It has shown to decrease property values. The emissions have made people sick. The emissions have caused an early death for some. 

Towers will be fair game for attorneys too. Especially those that go untested which is about 70% throughout the US. Big Money to be made there.

The SFD made 163,000 dollars in rental fees last year and I believe they own the tower structures. Take note.


Court Allows Expert Testimony in Litigation Alleging Cell Phone-Linked Tumors According to Consumers&#039; Legal Team

http://www.saferemr.com/2014/08/major-breakthrough-in-cellphone.html

These are for cases previous to the 1996 Congressional act that made it illegal for local government to base cell tower decisions on health or environment. The very reason most of you moved to the hight desert of Sedona/Verde Valley.  It is a landmark case  and the CDC issued this warning the next day so hang tight. People are going to start running for cover. 

Stay safe. Educate yourself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for printing this important news. </p>
<p>As many of you are aware, there have been expansions going on on the cell towers in Sedona and the Village.<br />
When they increase the height , they must go before local government and public because it will reach more homes . I notice now they are expanding the towers and area horizontally, not sure if local government is acting on that or simply allowing it.</p>
<p>Either way you are being pulsed with a 24/7 microwave radiation. Like the smart meter that 25% of residents opted out of. Very smart. Same microwave radiation.</p>
<p>There are plans for more towers every two miles and Cottonwood just approved two 90 footers right in the middle of the city. Yuk.</p>
<p>It has shown to decrease property values. The emissions have made people sick. The emissions have caused an early death for some. </p>
<p>Towers will be fair game for attorneys too. Especially those that go untested which is about 70% throughout the US. Big Money to be made there.</p>
<p>The SFD made 163,000 dollars in rental fees last year and I believe they own the tower structures. Take note.</p>
<p>Court Allows Expert Testimony in Litigation Alleging Cell Phone-Linked Tumors According to Consumers&#8217; Legal Team</p>
<p><a href="http://www.saferemr.com/2014/08/major-breakthrough-in-cellphone.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.saferemr.com/2014/08/major-breakthrough-in-cellphone.html</a></p>
<p>These are for cases previous to the 1996 Congressional act that made it illegal for local government to base cell tower decisions on health or environment. The very reason most of you moved to the hight desert of Sedona/Verde Valley.  It is a landmark case  and the CDC issued this warning the next day so hang tight. People are going to start running for cover. </p>
<p>Stay safe. Educate yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
