<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Another Sedona Monumental Mistake	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/another-sedona-monumental-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/another-sedona-monumental-mistake/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 13:33:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: J. Rick Normand		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/another-sedona-monumental-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-127059</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Rick Normand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 13:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53538#comment-127059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@David Reyburn &#038; all Readers at The Eye opposed to the revisited National Monument issue:

This is from Angela LeFevre’s own Curriculum Vitae posted at her website which she created to support her run for LD6 Legislator in 2012:

“I spent some time in London, working for the Labour Party as a Political Party Agent.”

“I have politics in my blood!”

Quoted from the Foreword to the 1947 Labour Party edition of the Communist Manifesto:

“In presenting this centenary volume of the Communist Manifesto, with the valuable Historical Introduction by Professor Laski, the Labour Party acknowledges its indebtedness to Marx and Engels as two men who have been the inspiration of the whole working class movement.”

Further the Foreword to the 1947 Labour Party edition of the Communist Manifesto says:

“Abolition of private property in land has long been a demand of the Labour movement.”

Think about the above statement very carefully, then consider the following in light of that statement: On October 18, 2012, Angela LeFevre, former City of Sedona Councilor and a very vocal supporter of KSB and The Sierra Club, had released in her behalf by sympathetic Steve DeVol, owner and publisher of Sedona.biz and a former President of KSB, a campaign video of her 2012 run for Arizona Legislative District 6 House of Representatives (which she lost). At the 5:05 mark she launches into this “…Sovereignty [of states] is a misnomer when it comes to one state which is a part of the United States of America and I don’t think that trying to create a sovereign state of Arizona does us any good whatsoever.” By virtue of this lame statement, LeFevre is demonstrably ignorant as to the Constitution of the United States since she 1.] quite obviously doesn’t understand the Constitution’s Tenth Amendment concept of dual federal and state sovereignty wherein the federal government’s sovereignty is defined and limited…while the state’s sovereignty is unlimited except for the powers specifically delegated to the federal government by virtue of quite specific language in the Constitution and 2.] she (LeFevre) clearly believes in the Labour/Communist party concept that ALL real property should be subject to federal control.

To this day, recalling that she has politics in her cold blood, Angela LeFevre still has the same Marxist political belief-system as she did in the U.K. and this is her true motivation behind once again pushing the Sedona Red Rock Verde Valley National Monument issue into the faces of the vast majority of Verde Valley and Arizona citizens opposed to the NM idea whom she cares nothing about and whom she chooses to ignore. Nor does she care about the sanctity of our Red Rocks which has nothing to do with what drives her political activism. Her recurrent NM movement is a flat out ruse to camouflage her Marxist bias towards total federalism! I have just proved that to you all. Show her the door again as you did last year.

JRN]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David Reyburn &amp; all Readers at The Eye opposed to the revisited National Monument issue:</p>
<p>This is from Angela LeFevre’s own Curriculum Vitae posted at her website which she created to support her run for LD6 Legislator in 2012:</p>
<p>“I spent some time in London, working for the Labour Party as a Political Party Agent.”</p>
<p>“I have politics in my blood!”</p>
<p>Quoted from the Foreword to the 1947 Labour Party edition of the Communist Manifesto:</p>
<p>“In presenting this centenary volume of the Communist Manifesto, with the valuable Historical Introduction by Professor Laski, the Labour Party acknowledges its indebtedness to Marx and Engels as two men who have been the inspiration of the whole working class movement.”</p>
<p>Further the Foreword to the 1947 Labour Party edition of the Communist Manifesto says:</p>
<p>“Abolition of private property in land has long been a demand of the Labour movement.”</p>
<p>Think about the above statement very carefully, then consider the following in light of that statement: On October 18, 2012, Angela LeFevre, former City of Sedona Councilor and a very vocal supporter of KSB and The Sierra Club, had released in her behalf by sympathetic Steve DeVol, owner and publisher of Sedona.biz and a former President of KSB, a campaign video of her 2012 run for Arizona Legislative District 6 House of Representatives (which she lost). At the 5:05 mark she launches into this “…Sovereignty [of states] is a misnomer when it comes to one state which is a part of the United States of America and I don’t think that trying to create a sovereign state of Arizona does us any good whatsoever.” By virtue of this lame statement, LeFevre is demonstrably ignorant as to the Constitution of the United States since she 1.] quite obviously doesn’t understand the Constitution’s Tenth Amendment concept of dual federal and state sovereignty wherein the federal government’s sovereignty is defined and limited…while the state’s sovereignty is unlimited except for the powers specifically delegated to the federal government by virtue of quite specific language in the Constitution and 2.] she (LeFevre) clearly believes in the Labour/Communist party concept that ALL real property should be subject to federal control.</p>
<p>To this day, recalling that she has politics in her cold blood, Angela LeFevre still has the same Marxist political belief-system as she did in the U.K. and this is her true motivation behind once again pushing the Sedona Red Rock Verde Valley National Monument issue into the faces of the vast majority of Verde Valley and Arizona citizens opposed to the NM idea whom she cares nothing about and whom she chooses to ignore. Nor does she care about the sanctity of our Red Rocks which has nothing to do with what drives her political activism. Her recurrent NM movement is a flat out ruse to camouflage her Marxist bias towards total federalism! I have just proved that to you all. Show her the door again as you did last year.</p>
<p>JRN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J. RIck Normand		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/another-sedona-monumental-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-127042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. RIck Normand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 19:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=53538#comment-127042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@All Readers at The Eye opposed to the revisited National Monument issue:

Regarding the creator and leader of the revisited NM issue I feel duty bound to pass this along:

This is from Angela LeFevre’s own Curriculum Vitae posted at her website which she created to support her run for LD6 Legislator in 2012:

“I spent some time in London, working for the Labour Party as a Political Party Agent.”

“I have politics in my blood!”

Quoted from the Foreword to the 1947 Labour Party edition of the Communist Manifesto:

“In presenting this centenary volume of the Communist Manifesto, with the valuable Historical Introduction by Professor Laski, the Labour Party acknowledges its indebtedness to Marx and Engels as two men who have been the inspiration of the whole working class movement.”

Further the Foreword to the 1947 Labour Party edition of the Communist Manifesto says:

“Abolition of private property in land has long been a demand of the Labour movement.”

Think about the above statement very carefully, then consider the following in light of that statement: On October 18, 2012, Angela LeFevre, former City of Sedona Councilor and a very vocal supporter of KSB and The Sierra Club, had released in her behalf by sympathetic Steve DeVol, owner and publisher of Sedona.biz and a former President of KSB, a campaign video of her 2012 run for Arizona Legislative District 6 House of Representatives (which she lost). At the 5:05 mark she launches into this “…Sovereignty [of states] is a misnomer when it comes to one state which is a part of the United States of America and I don’t think that trying to create a sovereign state of Arizona does us any good whatsoever.” By virtue of this lame statement, LeFevre is demonstrably ignorant as to the Constitution of the United States since she 1.] quite obviously doesn’t understand the Constitution’s Tenth Amendment concept of dual federal and state sovereignty wherein the federal government’s sovereignty is defined and limited…while the state’s sovereignty is unlimited except for the powers specifically delegated to the federal government by virtue of quite specific language in the Constitution and 2.] she (LeFevre) clearly believes in the Labour/Communist party concept that ALL real property should be subject to federal control.

To this day, recalling that she has politics in her cold blood, Angela LeFevre still has the same Marxist political belief-system as she did in the U.K. and this is her true motivation behind once again pushing the Sedona Red Rock Verde Valley National Monument issue into the faces of the vast majority of Verde Valley and Arizona citizens opposed to the NM idea whom she cares nothing about and whom she chooses to ignore. Nor does she care about the sanctity of our Red Rocks which has nothing to do with what drives her political activism. Her recurrent NM movement is a flat out ruse to camouflage her Marxist bias towards total federalism! I have just proved that to you all. Show her the door again as you did last year.

JRN]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@All Readers at The Eye opposed to the revisited National Monument issue:</p>
<p>Regarding the creator and leader of the revisited NM issue I feel duty bound to pass this along:</p>
<p>This is from Angela LeFevre’s own Curriculum Vitae posted at her website which she created to support her run for LD6 Legislator in 2012:</p>
<p>“I spent some time in London, working for the Labour Party as a Political Party Agent.”</p>
<p>“I have politics in my blood!”</p>
<p>Quoted from the Foreword to the 1947 Labour Party edition of the Communist Manifesto:</p>
<p>“In presenting this centenary volume of the Communist Manifesto, with the valuable Historical Introduction by Professor Laski, the Labour Party acknowledges its indebtedness to Marx and Engels as two men who have been the inspiration of the whole working class movement.”</p>
<p>Further the Foreword to the 1947 Labour Party edition of the Communist Manifesto says:</p>
<p>“Abolition of private property in land has long been a demand of the Labour movement.”</p>
<p>Think about the above statement very carefully, then consider the following in light of that statement: On October 18, 2012, Angela LeFevre, former City of Sedona Councilor and a very vocal supporter of KSB and The Sierra Club, had released in her behalf by sympathetic Steve DeVol, owner and publisher of Sedona.biz and a former President of KSB, a campaign video of her 2012 run for Arizona Legislative District 6 House of Representatives (which she lost). At the 5:05 mark she launches into this “…Sovereignty [of states] is a misnomer when it comes to one state which is a part of the United States of America and I don’t think that trying to create a sovereign state of Arizona does us any good whatsoever.” By virtue of this lame statement, LeFevre is demonstrably ignorant as to the Constitution of the United States since she 1.] quite obviously doesn’t understand the Constitution’s Tenth Amendment concept of dual federal and state sovereignty wherein the federal government’s sovereignty is defined and limited…while the state’s sovereignty is unlimited except for the powers specifically delegated to the federal government by virtue of quite specific language in the Constitution and 2.] she (LeFevre) clearly believes in the Labour/Communist party concept that ALL real property should be subject to federal control.</p>
<p>To this day, recalling that she has politics in her cold blood, Angela LeFevre still has the same Marxist political belief-system as she did in the U.K. and this is her true motivation behind once again pushing the Sedona Red Rock Verde Valley National Monument issue into the faces of the vast majority of Verde Valley and Arizona citizens opposed to the NM idea whom she cares nothing about and whom she chooses to ignore. Nor does she care about the sanctity of our Red Rocks which has nothing to do with what drives her political activism. Her recurrent NM movement is a flat out ruse to camouflage her Marxist bias towards total federalism! I have just proved that to you all. Show her the door again as you did last year.</p>
<p>JRN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
