Comments on: All We Want Are The Sedona Airport Facts

By: The COUNTY IS COMING FOR THE BOUNTY

The COUNTY IS COMING FOR THE BOUNTY — Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:50:25 +0000

Just like the redistricting of Cornville to the other side of the mountain, The County Supervisors of 4 to 1 will be taking over the Airport!!!!!!!!, just a matter of a few meetings. Whoa, that should round up some votes for bigger and better things down the road.
Stay tuned.
Sedona is up for grabs !!!!

By: Claudia

Claudia — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:03:13 +0000

too much fuss for nothing. p & z didn’t quite slam dunk approval which is not to say council won’t be unanimous. don’t they need a 2/3 vote to approve CP amendment? no problem. really is community plan any more than a useless meaningless waste of time?

By: E.S. Maddock

E.S. Maddock — Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:45:39 +0000

No, Susan, I’m not attending the meeting this evening (9/18) for the same reason I wasn’t at the work shop on September 13th. But you can rest assured I would love to be a fly on the wall. Wonder why P & Z Meetings, at least of this magnitude, aren’t televised?

xoxo
E.S. Maddock

By: Larry

Larry — Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:01:48 +0000

Jean’s question rephrased: What’s the poop scoop?

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:28:32 +0000

No disclosure of the sewage treatment plant? Why? Good question, Jean. This looks like a slippery slope (not literally yet) that somehow doesn’t pass the “smell test” even at these initial stages.

By: Jean

Jean — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:34:53 +0000

A wastewater treatment system is required on the public property Sky Ranch leases from the Sedona Airport [to replace the septic system] if City Hall rubber-stamps the Major Plan Amendment. ADEQ must sign off on it.

The Public Notice Sedonans received discloses 40 new lodging units, a 6000 sq.ft. conference center and a pool.

Why no disclosure of the sewage treatment plant?

By: Allen

Allen — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:36:12 +0000

I second Sunset comment.

By: Sunset Taxpayer

Sunset Taxpayer — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:44:56 +0000

can somebody break down those CoC chamber facts and city taxes paid to the Chamber for people like us – how much more would we pay on city property if we didn’t pay the chamber’s subsidy? enquiring minds want to know at bridge and tennis tables!

By: Eddie S. Maddock

Eddie S. Maddock — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:55:02 +0000

For taking time to post your varied opinions relating to Sedona issues, far over and above the nature of my original article, I thank you very much.

Healthy, spirited, and diverse dialog, in my opinion, generates and stimulates optional thinking, to which we are all entitled.

So far we still live in a country that allows us the right to speak up. Whether or not it does any good is another matter; however, doesn’t the opportunity to simply vent serve as a huge relief . . . mentally and spiritually? Hope so.

With gratitude and good cheer to all,
This sincerely,
Eddie S. Maddock

By: Warren

Warren — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 03:16:18 +0000

@ Sedona Sam

My figures are correct. I don’t BS or make stuff up.

The numbers in my first paragraph above are simple arithmetic.

The 10% of visitors to the City subsidized COC visitor center I got straight from Jennifer Wesselhof herself.

The number of businesses in Sedona I got from the AZ state government. The number of businesses that are members of the COC is (or was anyway) available at the COC website.

Lastly, the 2.7 residential units for every 1 lodging unit came just the other day from City of Sedona bureaucrat Mike Raber.

I didn’t just make an “interesting point”. I told the truth.