<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2013 Sedona City Musings, Part Two	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/</link>
	<description>Local News From All Points of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Julie		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-31271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-31271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AGREED ! @ Richard Saunders @PUBLICITY PAMPHLETS &#038; @Peter Vote No on the community plan. You see more invasions, more going to non city businesses, chamber. It already bad new plan let&#039;s them do whatever they want. Stop it Now. Vote No! Reject]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGREED ! @ Richard Saunders @PUBLICITY PAMPHLETS &amp; @Peter Vote No on the community plan. You see more invasions, more going to non city businesses, chamber. It already bad new plan let&#8217;s them do whatever they want. Stop it Now. Vote No! Reject</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marty		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-31270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-31270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Besides the two members of the steering committee supporting approval of the &quot;new&quot; Plan, two of the other letters are from members of the former housing commission (Linda Martinez and Sandy Moriarty.) 

Translated: vote &quot;yes&quot; and Mayor Adams&#039; dream for rezoning single family residential to multi-family will become a reality as is noted as being one of his future agenda items in the above article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides the two members of the steering committee supporting approval of the &#8220;new&#8221; Plan, two of the other letters are from members of the former housing commission (Linda Martinez and Sandy Moriarty.) </p>
<p>Translated: vote &#8220;yes&#8221; and Mayor Adams&#8217; dream for rezoning single family residential to multi-family will become a reality as is noted as being one of his future agenda items in the above article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Saunders		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-31267</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-31267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vote to reject the new city plan.   They want the citizens to walk, so more tourists can drive through. They want the citizens to pay higher fees, to they can give more unaccountable money to the chamber of commerce, so they can get more tourists and traffic. 

VOTE NO]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote to reject the new city plan.   They want the citizens to walk, so more tourists can drive through. They want the citizens to pay higher fees, to they can give more unaccountable money to the chamber of commerce, so they can get more tourists and traffic. </p>
<p>VOTE NO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PUBLICITY PAMPHLETS		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-31264</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PUBLICITY PAMPHLETS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-31264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Publicity Pamphlets have arrived in the mail.   &quot;Special Election&quot; March 11, 2014:  &quot;A resolution of the Mayor and Council of the City of Sedona, Arizona, finding and determining certain facts and adopting the November 2013 New Sedona Community Plan of the City of Sedona Arizona.

Two of the five letters of support are from members of the Steering Committee. (Angela LeFevre &#038; Jon Thompson) The revised plan has much to do with &quot;land use&quot; and increased density to be accomplished through future rezoning.

Please, read the letters, pro and con.  And even more important, read the proposed plan. Once approved, and although amendments aren&#039;t uncommon, it is your town, your property rights that are at stake here. 

A &quot;No&quot; vote will have the effect of rejecting the November 2013 New Sedona Community Plan and will keep the current 2002 Sedona Community Plan in effect until a new Plan is approved by Sedona voters.

A &quot;Yes&quot; vote will have the effect of approving the 2013 New Sedona Community Plan, as adopted by the Sedona City Council, including its required elements bringing it into compliance with Arizona law.

THOSE WHO DO NOT VOTE SEND A MESSAGE OF APPROVAL.  MAKE CERTAIN YOU ARE WILLING TO LIVE WITH THAT]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publicity Pamphlets have arrived in the mail.   &#8220;Special Election&#8221; March 11, 2014:  &#8220;A resolution of the Mayor and Council of the City of Sedona, Arizona, finding and determining certain facts and adopting the November 2013 New Sedona Community Plan of the City of Sedona Arizona.</p>
<p>Two of the five letters of support are from members of the Steering Committee. (Angela LeFevre &amp; Jon Thompson) The revised plan has much to do with &#8220;land use&#8221; and increased density to be accomplished through future rezoning.</p>
<p>Please, read the letters, pro and con.  And even more important, read the proposed plan. Once approved, and although amendments aren&#8217;t uncommon, it is your town, your property rights that are at stake here. </p>
<p>A &#8220;No&#8221; vote will have the effect of rejecting the November 2013 New Sedona Community Plan and will keep the current 2002 Sedona Community Plan in effect until a new Plan is approved by Sedona voters.</p>
<p>A &#8220;Yes&#8221; vote will have the effect of approving the 2013 New Sedona Community Plan, as adopted by the Sedona City Council, including its required elements bringing it into compliance with Arizona law.</p>
<p>THOSE WHO DO NOT VOTE SEND A MESSAGE OF APPROVAL.  MAKE CERTAIN YOU ARE WILLING TO LIVE WITH THAT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-31153</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-31153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sock it to the residents is the name of the game in Sedona. And all this pre-planning and plotting for the future. No hope for these people to heed Buddha&#039;s wise words. Their glory appears to be living in the future in order to arrogantly secure their legacies. Bah, humbug.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sock it to the residents is the name of the game in Sedona. And all this pre-planning and plotting for the future. No hope for these people to heed Buddha&#8217;s wise words. Their glory appears to be living in the future in order to arrogantly secure their legacies. Bah, humbug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynn		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-31149</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 01:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-31149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[10 %%%%%%%REAdjustmeNT wtf council sics sedona again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 %%%%%%%REAdjustmeNT wtf council sics sedona again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jean		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-31118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-31118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not good news for residential property owners connected to the sewer. 

Table 28, &quot;Recommended Wastewater Rate Schedule,&quot; from Consultant Hoag&#039;s proposed new WW rate study contains a 10% RETROACTIVE &quot;Cost of Service Adjustment&quot; for FY 2013-14, the current fiscal year.  It recommends changing the $47.34 existing monthly residential service rate to an adjusted rate of $52.24 (on paper only).  This means the 10% monthly increase officially deferred by the City will be negated IF the Mayor and Council approve the new rate study. 

Undoubtedly concerned property owners will ask where the current fiscal year $4.90/mo. rate increase for residential customers will come from.  

The table on the 2nd page of the &quot;2013 Annual Community REPORT&quot; shows a Wastewater &quot;Enterprise&quot; Fund Revenue Over Expenditures (YTD) projection of $1,335,603.  Are sewer ratepayers getting a refund of the amounts overcharged and overpaid?  No way!! 

Instead, when the rate study&#039;s Recommended Monthly Service Rates (Table 28) get rubberstamped, the Council will eliminate the FY 2013-14 deferrals even though the City&#039;s projected Revenue Over Expenditures (YTD) for the prior fiscal year was a positive $1,335,603. 

In addition, the City will reap a windfall by calculating the 6 years of 4% residential rate increases--to begin on July 1, 2014--by using the $52.24 PAPER amount instead of the $47.34 ACTUAL amount paid per month.  Over six years time, this hocus-pocus will extract several hundred dollars more from each and every residential property owner (ADUs and Residential Low Flow excepted).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not good news for residential property owners connected to the sewer. </p>
<p>Table 28, &#8220;Recommended Wastewater Rate Schedule,&#8221; from Consultant Hoag&#8217;s proposed new WW rate study contains a 10% RETROACTIVE &#8220;Cost of Service Adjustment&#8221; for FY 2013-14, the current fiscal year.  It recommends changing the $47.34 existing monthly residential service rate to an adjusted rate of $52.24 (on paper only).  This means the 10% monthly increase officially deferred by the City will be negated IF the Mayor and Council approve the new rate study. </p>
<p>Undoubtedly concerned property owners will ask where the current fiscal year $4.90/mo. rate increase for residential customers will come from.  </p>
<p>The table on the 2nd page of the &#8220;2013 Annual Community REPORT&#8221; shows a Wastewater &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; Fund Revenue Over Expenditures (YTD) projection of $1,335,603.  Are sewer ratepayers getting a refund of the amounts overcharged and overpaid?  No way!! </p>
<p>Instead, when the rate study&#8217;s Recommended Monthly Service Rates (Table 28) get rubberstamped, the Council will eliminate the FY 2013-14 deferrals even though the City&#8217;s projected Revenue Over Expenditures (YTD) for the prior fiscal year was a positive $1,335,603. </p>
<p>In addition, the City will reap a windfall by calculating the 6 years of 4% residential rate increases&#8211;to begin on July 1, 2014&#8211;by using the $52.24 PAPER amount instead of the $47.34 ACTUAL amount paid per month.  Over six years time, this hocus-pocus will extract several hundred dollars more from each and every residential property owner (ADUs and Residential Low Flow excepted).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kathy		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-31024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-31024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Eddie, a good reminder of what has been going on and especially for me since I was gone all summer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Eddie, a good reminder of what has been going on and especially for me since I was gone all summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-30989</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-30989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looking at what the mayor wants on future agendas is, well, troubling. If the election isn&#039;t until Nov. then new council won&#039;t be seated until first of year. Right? 

That means these people have one year to do how much more damage? Of course, that&#039;s not considering that any of them will run again. Perish that thought. Of course every election we hope to get better representation but all it amounts to is being worse than the previous ones. What happens to these people once seated behind those chairs? The power surge doesn&#039;t appear to be restricted to Smart Meters. (my opinion)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at what the mayor wants on future agendas is, well, troubling. If the election isn&#8217;t until Nov. then new council won&#8217;t be seated until first of year. Right? </p>
<p>That means these people have one year to do how much more damage? Of course, that&#8217;s not considering that any of them will run again. Perish that thought. Of course every election we hope to get better representation but all it amounts to is being worse than the previous ones. What happens to these people once seated behind those chairs? The power surge doesn&#8217;t appear to be restricted to Smart Meters. (my opinion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://sedonaeye.com/2013-sedona-city-musings-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-30982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sedonaeye.com/?p=36031#comment-30982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[after reading the decisions Kevin Snyder influenced in less than one year (down w/Commissions; support for more ways to tax residents and businesses; endorsement of the revised community plan, especially changes in land use; prompting city to buy Brewer property without solid plans for future funding for improvements . . . ) well, just imagine what more he could do had he not moved back to Auburn, WA. Good riddance and congratulations to Auburn!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after reading the decisions Kevin Snyder influenced in less than one year (down w/Commissions; support for more ways to tax residents and businesses; endorsement of the revised community plan, especially changes in land use; prompting city to buy Brewer property without solid plans for future funding for improvements . . . ) well, just imagine what more he could do had he not moved back to Auburn, WA. Good riddance and congratulations to Auburn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
