Home » From The Readers, Letters to the Editor » Muslim Acquiescence and Trust are Problematic

Muslim Acquiescence and Trust are Problematic

kennedySedona AZ (April 2, 2015) – The following is a letter to the SedonaEye.com editor:

Editor;

It seems as though almost everyone who mentions the Islamic problems today refers to the problem with “Radical Islam” or “Islamic Extremist” and I see it differently. The definition of “Radical” as it is being used is “Departing markedly from the usual or customary; extreme…” and those considered as radical are simply applying the tenets of the “Islamic Government” and often forcing unwilling members of the “Muslim Religion” to go along with them.

Following the prescribed doctrine of any faith is not radical; an example of a ‘Radical Islamic Act’ would be showing kindness and respect for the beliefs and traditions of any different belief system than theirs. I do not know many other than me who consider Islam as a form of Governance instead of a Religion, but the old saying “If it walks like a Duck, quacks like a Duck and looks like a Duck, it must be a Duck” applies here.

A Government with no physical boundaries; I maintain that no one nor any governmental entity will ever get a handle on the “Islamic Problem” until we recognize Islam as a Government that is intent on destroying every facet of the Judeo-Christian Belief; whether it be Jew or Christian and any nations even remotely based on Jewish and or Christian tenets.

Territorial borders and laws are at most mere inconveniences as Islam forces its way on the worldwide conquest, which is and always has been the ultimate goal of Islam.

The aforementioned example of “A Radical Islamic or an Islamic Extremist Act” would be showing kindness and respect for the beliefs and traditions of any different belief system than theirs is not an overstatement; that is the way it actually is. The Islamic Government and the “Muslim Religion” are both based on the teaching of Mohammad as written in the Qur’an, and those teachings are so singular that they leave no room for any opinions that may conflict with the “Islamic World Domination Ideology.” Any Muslim who will not get on board with that ideological doctrine and his family are subject to essentially the same fate as an “Infidel.”

The ‘Islam Stronghold’ is what we, in this country, would generally call “Pure Evil” when it comes to dealing with people that oppose them; however, for some reason today the supposed ‘Stalwarts of Civil Liberties’ appear to be muzzled or non-existent on any issues concerning Islam.

The National Organization of Women (NOW) remains totally silent about the Baby Rape, Honor Killings, Stoning of no longer wanted wives, and the grotesque practice of female circumcision that are all legal, acceptable under Islamic Sharia Law or the Gay and Lesbian bunch, who are far too busy fighting supposed, made-up and/or real ‘discrimination’ about Gay Marriage to consider the wanton misuse, abuse, and murder of homosexuals under Sharia Law.

All the above are “Legal under Sharia Law” and are “Illegal under the Judeo-Christian Based Laws” of any country, and far too many idiots who were elected to represent us are going along with a trend to make “Sharia Law Legal” within the United States which is “Stupidity Personified.”

Religious Freedom is beautiful when practiced within the constraints of “Legal under the Nations Laws.” My question is with the current climate of “Going Along to Get Along” practice; how long will it be before the majority of voters will willingly or unwillingly vote to replace our Constitution with the horrible, grotesque and immoral teachings of “Islamic Sharia Law” based on the Qur’an or Koran, whichever way you choose to spell it?

Perhaps we could get enough Muslims to become “Radicals” and defy the “Islamic Government with its Sharia Law”? They could throw off those shackles and become a major part of the solution instead of being enslaved under the “Iron Fist” which is constant fear of doing anything to upset their “Islamic Overlords.”

Would be nice to trust the good people, but, as it stands today, trusting any Muslim is very problematic because their life, family and property are on the line and family protection is natural.

Dale Gohr, Clarkdale, Arizona

Read www.SedonaEye.com for daily news and views!

Read www.SedonaEye.com for daily news and views!

5 Comments

  1. To Sedona Progressives and those who think they understand religious diversity:

    First, you and I are not infidels (that is a western word). To Muslims you and I are “Kafirs” which is worse than an apostate (which is a believer in Islam but not a literal practitioner of Mohammed’s words, otherwise known as a “moderate” Muslim). And, even apostates can be put to death for their failure to respect the literal word of Mohammed who wrote 86% of the Qur’an himself in just a few years. Also, remember this: All true Muslims throughout our country and right here in Sedona (you had better learn who they are), believe that Allah’s law is Shari’a and belief in the ideals of democracy and our Constitution is a sin. Therefore, the United States of America is an abomination to Allah and his Prophet, Mohammed. Too bad typically misguided and “politically correct” progressives don’t understand that Qur’anic Taqiyya permits all Muslims to intentionally lie to Kafirs for the purpose of duping Kafirs into Islamic conversion. Of course, U.S. and western progressives make the easiest amongst Kafir targets for purposes of duping them into facilitating the acceptance of Islam in the U.S., beginning in local enclaves, not to mention its Sharia Law by use of politically correct “religious diversity” arguments. This is the tactic they have used to take over Europe. Worse yet, progressives don’t understand that Islam is! In the first place, it is a political system which must engage in jihad for control of land and its native peoples, which is known as a caliphate, and second is a system of harsh law which dictates behavioral norms of every nomenclature imaginable as well as the utterly managed evolution of culture, and thirdly is a religion with a very different view of God from what we see as God. For instance, Americans and westerners are so naive about how Islam works, they think that when they see a Jihadist on the tube holding up a single index finger and yelling “Allahu Akbar” that they are saying “God is great!” THAT IS NOT WHAT IT MEANS. Allah is not the same God you believe in. What “Allahu Akbar” means is “Allah (Mohammed’s concept of God) is the GREATEST” as compared and contrasted to the God that any other religion prays to. That is why they always hold up an index finger signaling Number One.

  2. Firstly Islam is not a religion its a governance.

    Secondly Islam calls on Christians and Jews annihilation. Yes it is written. No misunderstanding.

    Thirdly we must prohibit Moslems from becoming citizens. They are anti free religion or no religion. If you profess no religion you are immediately given a death sentence. They can’t be citizens here because they don’t accept any government rules other then theirs.

    Being Moslem is fine if you Be it in your own Moslem land where you don’t get to kill nonbelievers. That’s common sense yes?

  3. Tom Walls says:

    President (Obama) is giving a great speech on Religious Tolerance and the danger a rotten apple in any barrel has on the perception of the barrel as a whole. We are all in this boat together, find the leaks and fix them.

  4. 11 Year old American Girl Murdered says:

    I got an email from several contacts about Al Gore that made me check Snopes.com for a true/false quiz. Here’s the truth straight from Snopes. I didn’t know about the American girl killed in Rome’s airport attack. I was too young.

    We need to remember. We need her murder and others to become as important as 9/11. We didn’t know then, we do know now. Here goes:

    For most of us who watched the televised Joint Hearings Before the Senate Select Committee on Secret Military Assistance to Iran and the Nicaraguan Opposition and the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran (better known as the “Iran-Contra hearings,” held by Congress to determine whether the Reagan administration had secretly and illegally sold arms to Iran in order to secure the release of American hostages, then used the profits from those sales to fund the contra rebels in Nicaragua) in 1987, the enduring image we came away with was a memory of an unapologetic and resolute Lt. Col. Oliver North delivering testimony in a Marine uniform. North, who was a central figure in the plan to secretly ship arms to Iran despite a U.S. trade and arms embargo, and who as a National Security Council aide directed efforts to raise private and foreign funds for the contras despite a Congressional prohibition on U.S. government agencies’ providing military aid to the Nicaraguan rebels, testified before Congress under a grant of limited immunity in July 1987.

    Although North had been granted limited immunity for his testimony, he was later convicted of criminal charges related to Iran-Contra activities (a conviction that was eventually overturned on the grounds that witnesses had been influenced by his immunized testimony). One of the charges against North was that he had received a $16,000 home security system paid for out of the proceeds of the Iran-Contra affair and had forged documents to cover his receipt of an illegal gratuity. North admitted that he knew the security system was a “gift” but maintained he never inquired about who had paid for it or how it was financed, and he was insistent that he needed the security system because the government had failed to provide adequate protection against international terrorists for him and his family.

    The terrorist North mentioned in his testimony was not Osama bin Laden, however. To the extent that bin Laden was known to the western world in 1987, it was not as a “terrorist” but as one of the U.S.-backed “freedom fighters” participating in the war against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden’s hatred of the U.S. and conversion to “terrorist” status is not believed to have come about until the Gulf War of 1990-91, when he was outspokenly critical of Saudi Arabian dependence upon the U.S. military and denounced U.S. support of a “corrupt, materialist, and irreligious” Saudi monarchy. (The Saudi Arabian government stripped bin Laden of his citizenship in 1994 for his funding of militant fundamentalist Islamic groups.)

    Oliver North did not testify about or mention the name Osama bin Laden during the Iran-Contra hearings. He claimed that threats against his life had been made by terrorist Abu Nidal, telling a congressional committee:
    Abu Nidal is, as I am sure you on the Intelligence Committee know, the principal, foremost assassin in the world today. He is a brutal murderer. And I would like to just, if I may, just read to you a little bit about Mr. Abu Nidal …

    “Abu Nidal, the radical Palestinian guerrilla leader, linked to last Friday’s attacks in Rome and Vienna” — that was the so-called Christmas massacre in which 19 people died and 200 were wounded — “is the world’s most wanted terrorist.” That is the Christian Science Monitor.

    When you look at his whole career, Abu Nidal makes the infamous terrorist Carlos [the Jackal] look like a Boy Scout.

    Abu Nidal himself, quoted in Der Spiegel, “Between America and us, there exists a war to the death. In the coming months and years, Americans will be thinking about us.”

    “For sheer viciousness, Abu Nidal has few rivals in the underworld of terrorism.” Newseek.

    Our own State Department, and we have copies of these that we can make available for insertion in the record, but the State Department summary on Abu Nidal, not exactly an overstatement, notes that his followers, who number an estimated 500, have killed as many as 181 persons, and wounded more than 200, in two years.

    Abu Nidal does not deny these things. We also have an exhibit that we can provide for you that shows what Abu Nidal did in the Christmas Massacres. One of the people killed in the Christmas Massacre — and I do not wish to overdramatize this — but the Abu Nidal terrorists in Rome who blasted the 11-year-old American Natasha Simpson to her knees, deliberately zeroed in and fired an extra burst at her head just in case.

    I want you to know that I’d be more than willing … to meet Abu Nidal on equal terms anywhere in the world. There’s an even deal for him. OK? But I am not willing to have my wife and my four children meet Abu Nidal or his organization on his terms.

    To emphasize his point, North showed the committee a blow-up of a newspaper article detailing the atrocities of Abu Nidal and recalled that an 11-year-old girl named Natasha Simpson, the daughter of an Associated Press news editor, had been gunned down (along with four other Americans) during an attack by an Abu Nidal group on the El Al terminal at the Rome airport in December 1985. North also later claimed that an attempt on his life had been made five months before his congressional testimony at the instigation of Libyan leader Mohmmar Qadaffi:

    In February 1987, Muammar Ghadaffi ordered his thugs to carry out a threat made against me in 1986. Thankfully, the FBI intercepted the well-armed perpetrators on the way to our home, and my family and I were sequestered for a time on a military base. The orders from Tripoli were delivered to a terrorist cell in Virginia — at the offices of The People’s Committee for Libyan Students.

    So no, Oliver North didn’t warn us back in 1987 about Osama bin Laden’s “potential threat to the security of the world” or suggest that bin Laden be hunted down by “an assassin team,” nor was he given the brush-off by a clueless senator “who disagreed with this approach.” Eventually, Col. North drafted his own response to this piece of misinformation:

    FROM THE DESK OF LTCOL OLIVER L. NORTH (USMC) RET.
    NOVEMBER 28, 2001

    OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST SEVERAL WEEKS, I HAVE RECEIVED SEVERAL THOUSAND E-MAILS FROM EVERY STATE IN THE U.S. AND 13 FOREIGN COUNTRIES IN WHICH THE ORIGINATOR PURPORTS TO HAVE RECENTLY VIEWED A VIDEOTAPE OF MY SWORN TESTIMONY BEFORE A CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE IN 1987.

    A COPY OF ONE OF THOSE E-MAILS IS ATTACHED BELOW. AS YOU WILL NOTE, THE ORIGINATOR ATTRIBUTES TO ME CERTAIN STATEMENTS REGARDING USAMA BIN LADEN AND OTHER MATTERS THAT ARE SIMPLY INACCURATE. THOUGH I WOULD LIKE TO CLAIM THE GIFT OF PROPHESY, I DON’T HAVE IT.

    I DON’T KNOW WHO SAW WHAT VIDEO “AT UNC.” (OR ANYWHERE ELSE) BUT, FOR THE RECORD, HERE’S WHAT I DO KNOW:

    1. IT WAS THE COMMITTEE COUNSEL, JOHN NIELDS, NOT A SENATOR WHO WAS DOING THE QUESTIONING.

    2. THE SECURITY SYSTEM, INSTALLED AT MY HOME, JUST BEFORE I MADE A VERY SECRET TRIP TO TEHRAN, COST, ACCORDING TO THE COMMITTEE, $16K, NOT $60K.

    3. THE TERRORIST WHO THREATENED TO KILL ME IN 1986, JUST BEFORE THAT SECRET TRIP TO TEHRAN, WAS NOT USAMA BIN LADEN, IT WAS ABU NIDAL (WHO WORKS FOR THE LIBYANS — NOT THE TALIBAN AND NOT IN AFGHANISTAN).

    4. I NEVER SAID I WAS AFRAID OF ANYBODY. I DID SAY THAT I WOULD BE GLAD TO MEET ABU NIDAL ON EQUAL TERMS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD BUT THAT I WAS UNWILLING TO HAVE HIM OR HIS OPERATIVES MEET MY WIFE AND CHILDREN ON HIS TERMS.

    5. I DID SAY THAT THE TERRORISTS INTERCEPTED BY THE FBI ON THE WAY TO MY HOUSE IN FEB. 87 TO KILL MY WIFE, CHILDREN AND ME WERE LIBYANS, DISPATCHED FROM THE PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE FOR LIBYAN STUDENTS IN MCLEAN, VIRGINIA.

    6. AND I DID SAY THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAD MOVED MY FAMILY OUT OF OUR HOME TO A MILITARY BASE (CAMP LEJEUNE, NC) UNTIL THEY COULD DISPATCH MORE THAN 30 AGENTS TO PROTECT MY FAMILY FROM THOSE TERRORISTS (BECAUSE A LIBERAL FEDERAL JUDGE HAD ALLOWED THE LYBIAN ASSASSINS TO POST BOND AND THEY FLED).

    7. AND, FYI: THOSE FEDERAL AGENTS REMAINED AT OUR HOME UNTIL I RETIRED FROM THE MARINES AND WAS NO LONGER A “GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL.” BY THEN, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT HAD SPENT MORE THAN $2M PROTECTING THE NORTH FAMILY. THE TERRORISTS SENT TO KILL US WERE NEVER RE-APPREHENDED.

    SEMPER FIDELIS,
    OLIVER L. NORTH

    Variations: One variant of this item concluded with the statement “The senator disagreed with this approach and that was all that was shown of the clip. If anyone is interested, the Senator turned out to be none other than … Al Gore.” Senator Al Gore of Tennessee was not a member of the United States Senate Select Committee on Secret Military Assistance to Iran and the Nicaraguan Opposition and therefore did not take part in the questioning of any witnesses before the Committee.

    Additional information:
    Testimony of Oliver L. North Testimony of Oliver L. North
    (U.S. Senate)

  5. Aliyah Layton says:

    France currently has the largest Muslim population in Western Europe, with about 2,600 mosques total in the country. The Schengen Agreement, which abolished border checks among the 26 member states, allows residents of the European Union of more than 400 million to travel freely throughout Europe without showing identification or being screened. The border policy may be reconsidered, as it gives easy access to undocumented migrants including radical Muslims to infiltrate the country and stage future terrorist attacks.

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2008-2017 · Sedona Eye · All Rights Reserved · Posts · Comments · Facebook · Twitter ·